Dialogue Analysis Using a Text Mining Approach: Case Study of Hirono Town

Madoka Chosokabe, Maiko Sakamoto, Mikiyasu Nakayama

Abstract


This case study examined public participation regarding reconstruction of the disaster-affected areas in the Fukushima Prefecture of Japan following the Great East Japan Earthquake in March 2011. The study aimed at (i) identifying the topics discussed and shared by the residents, and (ii) revealing the contribution of the media to ensuring information transparency in the regional planning process. We applied text mining—in particular, correspondence analysis—to (a) the text data from dialogue sessions with local residents and (b) newspaper articles that appeared in a nation-wide newspaper in order to identify the similarities and differences between the topics discussed by session participants and those that appeared in newspaper articles. It turned out that the newspaper articles did not adequately address some important topics discussed in the dialogues. This implies that the coverage by the mass media has much room for improvement in the transparency of the information it provides and supporting the development and implementation of administrative agendas involving citizens and municipalities.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Asahi shimbun digital. (2016). KIKUZO II VISUAL. Retrieved from http://database.asahi.com/ (Dec 4, 2016).

Brains, L. C., & Wattenberg, P. M. (1996). Campaign issue knowledge and salience: Comparing reception from TV commercials, TV news and newspapers. American Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 172–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111699

Chosokabe, M., Sakakibara, H., Miyaji, T., & Nishimura, T. (2012). Analysis of WS discussion in participatory planning process. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2441–2445. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1109/ICSMC.2012.6378109

Chosokabe, M., Umeda, H., & Sakakibara, H. (2016). The contribution of social context to participatory planning processes within a Japanese community. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25(5), 923–940. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/s10726-015-9466-2

Clausen, S. E. (1998). Applied correspondence analysis (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. (Chapter 1)

Greenacre, M., & Blasius, J. (Eds.). (1994). Correspondence analysis in the social sciences (1st ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Higuchi, K. (2001). KH Coder. [Online] Available: http://khc.sourceforge.net/ (Jan 4, 2017).

Hirono town. (2016). Th¬inking from disaster affected areas and Hirono. Retrieved from http://www.town.hirono.fukushima.jp/data/open/cnt/3/1566/1/HIrono-Forum-Report_A4.pdf (Jan 4, 2017).

Jeong, H., Hatori, T., & Kobayashi, K. (2007). Discourse analysis of public debate: A corpus-based approach. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1782–1793. doi: 10.1109/ICSMC.2007.4413973

Jeong, H., Shiramatsu, S., Hatori, T., & Kobayashi, K. (2008). Discourse analysis of public debates using corpus linguistic methodologies. Journal of Computers, 3(8), 58–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jcp.3.8.58-68

Mannarini, T., & Roccato, M. (2011). Uses of the term NIMBY in the Italian press: 1992–2008. Environmental Politics, 20(6), 807–825. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.617167

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2011). Restoration and revival following the Great East Japan Earthquake - Creative recovery, starting with the development of human resources. http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/hakusho/html/hpab201101/detail/1330449.htm (Jan 4, 2017).

Prince, V. (1989). Social identification and public opinion: Effects of communicating group conflict. American Association for Public Opinion Research, 53(2), 197–224.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jad.v3i1.10583

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Journal of Asian Development  ISSN 2377-9594   E-mail: jad@macrothink.org

Copyright © Macrothink Institute 

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domains to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', please check your 'spam' or 'junk' folder.