Writing Matrix and Assessing Literature Review: A Methodological Element of a Scientific Project

Erni Murniarti, Bernard Nainggolan, Hulman Panjaitan, L.Elly AM Pandiangan, I Dewi Ayu Widyani, Saniago Dakhi


A debatable consensus on and appropriate approaches to literature review function as the theoretical background of the paper. It redefines the literature review substance, synthesis, and procedure to literature matrix, and literature review assessment. In addition, some implications are to interpret the discussion. Finally, finding of the present study is applicable to any study fields at it generally provides matrix for which writing literature review can be easily conducted. Suggestions, identical to the potential of further studies and its application by on-going researcher and writer, are holistically provided.

Full Text:



Andrade, H. L., & Du, Y. (2005). Student Perspectives on Rubric-Referenced Assessment. Educational & Counseling Psychology Faculty Scholarship, 10(3). Retrieved from https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/edpsych_fac_scholar/2

Azar, A. S., & Hashim, A. (2014). Towards an analysis of review article in Applied Linguistics: Its classes, purposes and characteristics English Language Teaching, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n10p76

Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC medical research methodology, 9(1), 59. Retrieved from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/690/1/0109%2520Qualitative%2520synthesis%2520methods%250paper%2520NCRM.pdf

Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-15.

Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2012). A systematic approaches to a successful literature review. California: Sage Publication Inc.

Burge, S. (2006). The systems thinking toolbox. Retrieved from https://www.burgehugheswalsh.co.uk/uploaded/1/documents/md-tool-box-v1.0.pdf

Chalmers, D. J. (2005). The matrix as metaphysics. Retrieved from http://consc.net/papers/matrix.pdf

Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2007). Undertaking a literature: A step-by-step-approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059

Dakhi, S. (2011).Lexical changes of southern dialect of Li Niha. Jurnal Linguistik Terapan, 8(2), 85-106. Retrieved from http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/3219/

Dakhi, S. (2009). Students’difficulties in reading English newspaper. Jurnal Littera, 2(1), 19-27. Retrieved from http://repository.uki.ac.id/267/

Deane, P., Odendahl, N., Quinlan, T., Fowles, M., Welsh, C., & Bivens‐Tatum, J. (2008). Cognitive models of writing: Writing proficiency as a complex integrated skill. ETS Research Report Series, 2008(2), i-36.

Fang, J., Mitra, P., Tang, Z., & Giles, C. L. (2012, July). Table Header Detection and Classification. In AAAI (pp. 599-605). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2e4c/cf5445490a176dabdf77a5e39cb11f88970c.pdf

Fink, A. (2005). Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. Thousand Oaks California: Sage Publications.

Foster, R. (2013). Literature search and data synthesis methods for estimating inputs for health, economic modeling (Technical Report). Retrieved from https://www.otago.ac.nz/wellington/otago042138.pdf

Goldman, K. D., & Schmalz, K. J. (2004). The matrix method of literature review HealthPromotion Practice, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839903258885

Goldschmidt, P. G. (1986). Information Synthesis Health service. Research Retrieved from http://jameslindlibrary.org/wp-data/uploads/2014/06/Goldschmidt_1986_whole_article.pdf

Gopen, G. D., & Swan, J. A. (1990). The science of scientific writing. Retrieved from http://www.sdc.uwo.ca/writing/img/pdfs/The-Science-of-Scientific-Writing.pdf

Grant, M. J., & Bootht, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Green, R., & Bowser, M. (2006). Observations from the field. Journal of Library Administration, 45(1-2). 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1300/J111v45n01_10

Haas, C., & Flower, L. (1988). Rhetorical reading strategies and the construction of meaning. College Composition and Communication, 39(2), 167-183. https://doi.org/10.2307/358026

Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.

Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009

Hu, J. (2010). The schematic structure of literature review in research articles of Applied Linguistics. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 15-37.

Intersegmental Committee of the Academic Senates. (2002). Academic Literacy: A Statement of Competencies Expected of Students Entering California’s Public Colleges and Universities Retrieved from https://senate.universityofcalifornia.edu/_files/reports/acadlit.pdf

Jaidka, K., Khoo, C. S. G., & Na, J. C. (2013). Literature review writing: How information is selected and transformed. Aslib Proceedings, 65(3), 303-325. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531311330665

Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: Philosophy definition and procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49-62.

Järvinen, P. (2008). On developing and evaluating of the literature review. Retrieved from http://www.sis.uta.fi/cs/reports/dsarja/D-2008-10.pdf

Johnsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002

Kellogg, R. T. (1990). Effectiveness of prewriting strategies as a function of task demands. The American Journal of Psychology, 103(3), 327-342. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423213

Khoo, C. S. G., Na, J‐C., & Jaidka, K. (2011). Analysis of the macro‐level discourse structure of literature reviews. Online Information Review, 35(2), 255‐271.

Klopper, R., & Lubbe, S. (2012). Using matrix to achieve traction coherence progression and closure in problem-solution oriented research. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1018&context=confirm2012

Klopper, R., Lubbe, S., & Rugbeer, H. (2007). The matrix method of literature review. Alternation, 14(1), 1-17.

Knight, L. A. (2006). Using rubrics to assess information literacy. Reference Services Review, 34(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320610640752

Knudson, R. E. (1998). College students’ writing: An assessment of competence. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(1), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679809597571

Kwan, B. S. C. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1). 30‐55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.06.001

Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2006). A system approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information system research (E Cohen Ed). Informing Science Journal, 9(37).

Lovitts, B. E. (2005). How to grade a dissertation. Academe November/December 2005 Issue. Retrieved from https://www.ittc.ku.edu/~frost/How_to_grade_disseration_Academe_Article.pdf

Male, H. (2017). EFL undergraduate students’ learning style preferences. The 3rd International Indonesian Forum for Asian studies.

Mah, D. K. & Ifenthaler. (2018). Students’ perception toward academic competencies: The case of German first-year students. Issues in Education Research, 28(1). Retrieved from http://www.iier.org.au/iier28/mah.pdf

Mathew, s R. (2004). Developing a matrix approach to categorise the social and environmental accounting research literature. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 1(1), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766090410816280

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods Sourcebook. London: Sage Publication.

Müller-Bloch, C., & Kranz, J. (2015). A framework for rigorously identifying research gaps in qualitative literature reviews. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/89e6/a54cbe7240488d88ce49b51fc83c7186d564.pdf

Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems,10(26), 1-50. Retrieved from http://sprouts.aisnet.org/10-26

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Weinbaum, R. K. (2016). Mapping Miles and Huberman’s within-case and cross-case analysis methods onto the literature review process. Journal of Educational Issues, 2(1), 265-288.

Paseau, A. C. (2017). Philosophy of the matrix. Philosophia Mathematica, 25(2), 246-267.

Puks R (nd). Software tools for supporting literature review: An overview and a case, (Master Thesis. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwj GjMfdlM_aAhXMQo8KHfEgCyYQFghIMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.tlu.ee%2Ft eemad%2Fget_file.php%3Fid%3D449&usg=AOvVaw3Ug5KjpSv6ZiyJEke_BXE5

Randolph, J. J. (2009). A guide to writing the dissertation literature review Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 4(13), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859

Reuber, A. R. (2010). Strengthening your literature review. Family Business Review, 23(2),105-108.

Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. ssessment & evaluation in higher education, 5(4), 435-448.

Ritchey, T. (1991). Analysis and synthesis: on scientific method–based on a study by Bernhard Riemann. ystems research, (4), 21-41. Retrieved from http://www.swemorph.com/pdf/anaeng-r.pdf

Samnani, S. S., Vaska, M., Ahmed, S., & Turin, T. C. (2017). Review Typology: The Basic Types of Reviews for Synthesizing Evidence for the Purpose of Knowledge Translation. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan: JCPSP, 27(10), 635-641.

Sastry, M. K., & Mohammed, C. (2013, July). The summary-comparison matrix: A tool for writing the literature review. In Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2013 IEEE International pp. (1-5). IEEE Retrieved from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6623891/

Soares, C. B., Hoga, L. A. K., Peduzzi, M., Sangaleti, C., Yonekura, T., & Silva, D. R. A. D. (2014). Integrative review: concepts and methods used in nursing. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 48(2), 335-345. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reeusp/v48n2/0080-6234-reeusp-48-02-335.pdf

Schweiker-Marra, K. E., & Marra, W. T. (2000). Investigating the effects of prewriting activities on writing performance and anxiety of at-risk students. Reading Psychology, 21(2), 99-114. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710050084437

Akasofu, S. I. (2007). The importance of synthesis: A suggestion for international research efforts. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 88(25), 264-264. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007EO250007

Taylor, D. M. (2002). The appropriate use of references in a scientific research paper. Emergency Medicine, 14(2), 166-170. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9db3/8b5f3cd180797529fb9e6da329f904d6faa3.pdfhttps://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2026.2002.00312.x

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

Tkacz, W. W. (2010). The use of the matrix diagram as a tool for the analysis of effectiveness of supply chain. In Log Forum (Vol. 6, No. 2, p. 4). Retrieved from http://www.logforum.net/vol6/issue2/no4

Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS quarterly, xiii-xxiii. Retrieved from https://web.njit.edu/~egan/Writing_A_Literature_Review.pdf

Yang, H., & Tate, M. (2012). A descriptive literature review and classification of cloud computing research. CAIS, 31, 2 Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol31/iss1/2

Zhao, R., & Hirvela, A. (2015). Undergraduate ESL Students' Engagement in Academic Reading and Writing in Learning to Write a Synthesis Paper. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(2), 219-241

Zaid, M. A. (2011). Effects of web-based pre-writing activities on college EFL students’ writing performance and their writing apprehension. Journal of King Saud University-Languages and Translation, 23(2), 77-85.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jad.v4i2.13895


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Journal of Asian Development  ISSN 2377-9594   E-mail: jad@macrothink.org

Copyright © Macrothink Institute 

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domains to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', please check your 'spam' or 'junk' folder.