The Myth of Administrative Decentralization in the Context of Centralized Human Resources Recruitment in Tanzania

Mrutu Lukio Lawrence, Stella Kinemo

Abstract


Tanzania is implementing the decentralization by devolution policy (D by D) as a mechanism of facilitating quick development process through the involvement of people from grass root levels. One of the areas for decentralization is administrative decentralization whereby local government authorities are regarded as autonomous organs when it comes to management of human resources from hiring to firing. However, recently from 2009, the government decided to establish a new centralized recruitment system, which recruits and allocates human resources on behalf of local government authorities and other government institutions. Several reasons have been advocated in favour of these changes like to facilitate uniformity and lack of meritocracy by the local government authorities. Using secondary data, this paper attempts to show how the establishment of centralized recruitment in Tanzania has acted as a thorn towards the full attainment of administrative decentralization. The paper ends by concluding that centralized recruitment has not only weakened local authorities in implementing D by D policy but it has left a lacuna in the real meaning of D by D policy.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali Khan, S. (2013). Decentralization and poverty reduction: A theoretical framework for exploring the linkages. International Review of Public Administration, 18(2), 145-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2013.10805256

Awortwi, N. (2013). The past, present, and future of decentralisation in Africa: a comparative case study of local government development trajectories of Ghana and Uganda. In Public Sector Reform in Developing and Transitional Countries (pp. 46-60). Routledge.

Barnett, C. C., Henry, P. M., & Jerry, V. (1997). Democratic Decentralization. (December): 0–19.

Braathen, E., Chaligha, A., & Fjeldstad, O. H. (2004). Local governance, finances and service delivery in Tanzania. In Workshop, which took place in Dar es Salaam in March (Vol. 25, p. 26).

Coggburn, J. D. (2005). The benefits of human resource centralization: Insights from a survey of human resource directors in a decentralized state. Public Administration Review, 65(4), 424-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00469.x

Falleti, T. G. (2005). A sequential theory of decentralization: Latin American cases in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 327-346. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051695

Green, A. (2005). Managing Human Resources in a Decentralized Context. East Asia decentralizes: Making local government …: 129–54. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=_XO6xllwH14C&oi=fnd&pg=PA129&dq=Managing+Human+resources+in+a+decentralized+Context&ots=DWsF6JmPam&sig=osQxtwQuRlCP76HRLOuA7MU4V5c.

Hays, S. W., & Kearney, R. C. (2001). Anticipated changes in human resource management: Views from the field. Public Administration Review, 61(5), 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00129

Kauzya, J. M. (2007). Political Decentralization in Africa: Experiences of Uganda, Rwanda and South Africa. Decentralizing governance: Emerging concepts and practices, 75-91.

Manor, J. (1999). The Political Economy of Democratic Decentralization (The World Bank, Washington, DC).

Mrutu, L. L., & Ngowi, A. O. (2016). How centralized recruitment influence employee’s turnover in Tanzania Local Government Authorities: Experience from Moshi Municipal Council. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(9), 2222-6990. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i9/2314

Munga, M. A., Songstad, N. G., Blystad, A., & Mæstad, O. (2009). The decentralisation-centralisation dilemma: recruitment and distribution of health workers in remote districts of Tanzania. BMC international health and human rights, 9(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-698X-9-9

Muriu, A. R. (2014). 1 How does Citizen Participation impact Decentralized Service Delivery? Lessons from the Kenya Local Authority Service Delivery Action Plan (LASDAP, 2002-2010) i.

Mzee, M. M. (2008). Local Government in Tanzania: Does the Local Government Law in Tanzania Give Autonomy To Local Government. (November). http://etd.uwc.ac.za/usrfiles/modules/etd/docs/etd_gen8Srv25Nme4_5923_1306481925.pdf.

Ribot, J. C., Agrawal, A., & Larson, A. M. (2006). Recentralizing while decentralizing: how national governments reappropriate forest resources. World development, 34(11), 1864-1886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.020

Rohitarachoon, P., & Hossain, F. (2012). Decentralized Recruitment and Selection in Thailand: Friend or Foe to Local Public Administration?. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(8), 553-561. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.653513

Undp-government, Joint. (1999). Decentralization: A Sampling of Definitions. (October).

Venugopal, V., & Yilmaz, S. (2010). Decentralization in Tanzania: an assessment of local government discretion and accountability. Public Administration and Development, 30(3), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.556




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v9i1.13798

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Journal of Public Administration and Governance  ISSN 2161-7104

Copyright © Macrothink Institute

'Macrothink Institute' is a trademark of Macrothink Institute, Inc.

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.