High-Performance Human Resource Practices and Team Job Satisfaction: Moderating Role of Team Citizenship Behaviors

Kaumudi Misra


Strategic human resource management literature has highlighted the role of high performance work systems as a set of workplace practices that enhance employee productivity and organizational performance. While the high performance literature has been around for over two decades now, research in this area has been staggered, and inconclusive about the organizational variables that comprise high performance work practices, as well as the effects of these practices on organizational outcomes - especially attitudinal employee outcomes such as job satisfaction and commitment. By creating an environment of empowerment and teamwork, high performance work practices motivate employees to perform better.  One of the ways in which these workplace practices achieve higher performance is by eliciting discretionary, or extra-role behaviors, from employees. Using foundational research from the high performance paradigm, this paper examines the effects of team-level strategic HR practices on job satisfaction. Analyses of data collected from 138 frontline teams in US Midwestern hospitals, show that while self-managed work teams and team communication result in higher job satisfaction for members, this effect is mitigated when team members display organizational citizenship behaviors. Theoretical and practical implications of findings are discussed.

Full Text:



Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing Advantage: Why High Performance Work Systems Pay Off, Cornell University Press, 2000.

Berg, P. (1999). The effects of high performance work practices on job satisfaction in the United States steel industry. Relations industrielles/Industrial relations, 54(1), 111-135. https://doi.org/10.7202/051222ar

Berg, P., Kalleberg, A. L., & Appelbaum, E. (2003). Balancing work and family: The role of high‐commitment environments. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 42(2), 168-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-232X.00286

Boxall, P., & Macky, K. (2014). High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being. Work, employment and society, 28(6), 963-984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017013512714

Boxall, P., Guthrie, J. P., & Paauwe, J. (2016). Editorial introduction: Progressing our understanding of the mediating variables linking HRM, employee well‐being and organisational performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(2), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12104

Brief, A., & Motowidlo, S. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors, Academy of Management Review, 11, 710-725. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283909

Burt, R. S. (2017). Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In Social capital (pp. 31-56). Routledge.

Cappelli, P., & David, N. (2001) “Do ‘High-performance’ work practices improve establishment-level outcomes?”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(4), July 2001, pp. 737-775.

Carter, D. R., DeChurch, L. A., Braun, M. T., & Contractor, N. S. (2015). Social network approaches to leadership: An integrative conceptual review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 597. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038922

Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of management journal, 49(3), 544-560. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794671

Elorza, U., Harris, C., Aritzeta, A., & Balluerka, N. (2016). The effect of management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems on employees’ discretionary behaviour. Personnel Review, 45(1), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2014-0167

Fabi, B., Lacoursière, R., & Raymond, L. (2015). Impact of high-performance work systems on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and intention to quit in Canadian organizations. International Journal of Manpower, 36(5), 772-790. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-01-2014-0005

Farmer, N. (2017). The invisible organization: How informal networks can lead organizational change. Routledge.

García, C. R., Neira, F. E., & Varela, N. C. (2016). High-performance work systems and job satisfaction: a multilevel model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(2), 451-466. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-04-2013-0127

George, J., & Brief, A. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: a conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 310-329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.310

Graham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 249-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01385031

Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469

Huang, L. C., Ahlstrom, D., Lee, A. Y. P., Chen, S. Y., & Hsieh, M. J. (2016). High performance work systems, employee well-being, and job involvement: An empirical study. Personnel Review, 45(2), 296-314. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2014-0201

Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of HRM practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.

Ichniowski, C., Kathryn, S., & Giovanna, P. (1997). The Effect of Human Resource Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines, American Economic Review, 87(3), 291-313.

Jensen, J. M., Patel, P. C., & Messersmith, J. G. (2013). High-performance work systems and job control: Consequences for anxiety, role overload, and turnover intentions. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1699-1724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311419663

Jiang, J. Y., & Liu, C. W. (2015). High performance work systems and organizational effectiveness: The mediating role of social capital. Human Resource Management Review, 25(1), 126-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2014.09.001

Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2015). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Harvard Business Review Press.

Kehoe, R. R., & Wright, P. M. (2013). The impact of high-performance human resource practices on employees’ attitudes and behaviors. Journal of management, 39(2), 366-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365901

Li, H. Y., & Yu, G. L. (2017). A Multilevel Examination of High-Performance Work Systems and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Social Exchange Theory Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5821-5835. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01032a

Macduffie, J. P. (1995) Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399504800201

Macky, K., & Boxall, P. (2007). The relationship between ‘high-performance work practices’ and employee attitudes: an investigation of additive and interaction effects. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(4), 537-567. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190601178745

Macky, K., & Boxall, P. (2008). High‐involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well‐being: A study of New Zealand worker experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 46(1), 38-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038411107086542.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978).

Orbach, M., Demko, M., Doyle, J., Waber, B. N., & Pentland, A. (2015). Sensing informal networks in organizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(4), 508-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214556810

Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior, in L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 43-72, Greenwich, CT: JAI.

Posthuma, R. A., Campion, M. C., Masimova, M., & Campion, M. A. (2013). A high performance work practices taxonomy: Integrating the literature and directing future research. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1184-1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478184

Ramsay, H., Scholarios, D., & Harley, B. (2000). Employees and high‐performance work systems: Testing inside the black box. British Journal of industrial relations, 38(4), 501-531. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00178

Schnake, M. (1991). Organizational citizenship: A review, proposed model, and research agenda, Human Relations, 44, 735-759. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679104400706

Scott, J. (2017). Social Network Analysis. Sage.

Shin, D., & Konrad, A. M. (2017). Causality between high-performance work systems and organizational performance. Journal of Management, 43(4), 973-997. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314544746

Sikora, D. M., Ferris, G. R., & Van Iddekinge, C. H. (2015). Line manager implementation perceptions as a mediator of relations between high-performance work practices and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1908. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000024

Snape, E., & Redman, T. (2010). HRM practices, organizational citizenship behaviour, and performance: A multi‐level analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 47(7), 1219-1247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00911.x

Staw, B. M., & Boettger, R. D. (1990). Task revision: A neglected form of work performance, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 534-559.

Sun, L. Y., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: A relational perspective. Academy of management Journal, 50(3), 558-577. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25525821

Van De Voorde, K., & Jensen, J. M. (2016). High Performance at the Expense of Employee Health? Reconciling the Dark Side of High Performance Work Systems. In Understanding the High Performance Workplace (pp. 81-102). Routledge.

Van De Voorde, K., Paauwe, J., & Van Veldhoven, M. (2012). Employee well‐being and the HRM–organizational performance relationship: a review of quantitative studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00322.x

Van Dyne, L., & Cummings, L. L. (1990). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, San Francisco.

Van Dyne, L. J., Graham, W., & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation, Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765.

Wang, C. H., Baba, V. V., Hackett, R. D., & Hong, Y. (2016). Effects of High-Performance Work Systems on Expanding Employee OCB Role Definitions. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2016, No. 1, p. 12081). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.12081abstract

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478

White, M., Hill, S., McGovern, P., Mills, C., & Smeaton, D. (2003). ‘High‐performance’ Management Practices, Working Hours and Work–Life Balance. British journal of industrial Relations, 41(2), 175-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00268

Wood, S., & Ogbonnaya, C. (2016). High-involvement management, economic recession, well-being, and organizational performance. Journal of Management, 0149206316659111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316659111

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v8i3.13010

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.

Copyright © Macrothink Institute   ISSN 2162-3058

'Macrothink Institute' is a trademark of Macrothink Institute, Inc.