Predicting Correctional Officer Job Performance Using the Critical Hire-Screen and Personality Assessment Inventory: An Analysis of Incremental Validity

Anthony Tatman

Abstract


This article measured the degree to which the Critical Hire-Screen (CH-S), a pre-employment test of integrity, and Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), a test of psychopathology, correlated with and predicted supervisor ratings of correctional officer job performance. Results revealed that the CH-S provided the strongest correlation with, and prediction of, job performance. Although PAI subscales contributed to the prediction model, relatively few subscales were ultimately selected, resulting in the CH-S explaining the majority of the variance. Implications for correctional agencies and pre-employment evaluators are discussed, and recommendations for the practical application of these results to pre-employment testing process are provided.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Berry, C. M., Sackett, P. R., & Wiemann, S. (2007). A review of recent developments in integrity test research. Personnel Psychology, 60(2), 271-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00074.x

DeCoster-Martin, E., Weiss, W. U., Davis, R. D., & Rostow, C. D. (2004). Compulsive traits and police officer performance. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 19(2), 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02813874

Fine, S. (2013). A look at cross-cultural integrity testing in three banks. Personnel Review, 42(3), 266-280. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481311320408

Fine, S., Horowitz, I., Weigler, H., & Basis, L. (2010). Is good character good enough? The effects of situational variables on the relationship between integrity and counterproductive work behaviors. Human Resource Management Review, 20(1), 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.03.010

Herrmann, D. S., & Bedwell, S. (2014). Selecting and hiring psychologically fit probation officers: A focused examination of the PEPQ/PSR Plus. International Journal of Court Administration, 6(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.117

Jones, J. W., Cunningham, M. R., & Dages, K. D. (2010). Pre-offer police integrity testing: Scientific foundations and professional issues. In P. A. Weiss (Ed.), Personality Assessment in Police Psychology: A 21st Century Perspective (pp. 159-187). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher.

Lowmaster, S. E., & Morey, L. C. (2012). Predicting law enforcement officer job performance with the Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(3), 254-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.648295

Marcus, B., Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2013). A note on the incremental validity of integrity tests beyond standard personality inventories for the criterion of counterproductive behaviour. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 30(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1235

Morey, L. C. (2003). In A. S. Kaufman & N. L. Kaufman (Eds.), Essentials of the PAI Assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Morey, L. C. (2007). The Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual (2nd ed.) Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Nicol, A. M., & Paunonen, S. V. (2002). Overt honesty measures predicting admissions: An index of validity or reliability. Psychological Reports, 90(1), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2002.90.1.105

Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 78(4), 679-703. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.679

Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (2003). Personality and absenteeism: A meta-analysis of integrity tests. European Journal of Personality, 17(SPEC. 1), S19-S38. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.487

Roberts, M., Thompson, J., & Johnson, M. (1999). PAI Law Enforcement, Corrections, and Public Safety Selection Report module. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Roscoe, T., Duffee, D. E., Rivera, C., & Smith, T. R. (2007). Arming probation officers: Correlates of the decision to arm at the departmental level 1. Criminal Justice Studies, 20(1), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786010701241333

Sackett, P. R., & Lievens, F. (2008). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 419-450. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093716

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262

Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I-S., Shaffer, J. A. (2016). The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: Practical and Theoretical Implications of 100 Years of Research Findings. Retrieved from https://www.testingtalent.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2016-100-Yrs-Working-Paper-on-Selection-Methods-Schmit-Mar-17.pdf

Shusman, E. J., & Inwald, R. E. (1991). A longitudinal validation study of correctional officer job performance as predicted by the IPI and MMPI. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19(2), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(91)90051-V

Small, S., & Torres, S. (2001). Arming probation officers: Enhancing public confidence and officer safety. Federal Probation, 65(3), 24-28.

Tatman, A. W. (2019a). Critical Hire Assessments: Technical Manual for the Critical Hire-Screen and Critical Hire-Personality Assessment. Urbandale, Iowa: Critical Hire, PLC.

Tatman, A. W. (2019b). Predicting Correctional Officer Employment Success: Criterion Validity for the Critical Hire – Screen. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Tatman, A. W., & Huss, M. T. (2019a). Criminal thinking and pre-employment integrity testing: Correlations between the Texas Christian University Criminal Thinking Scales and Critical Hire-Screen. Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(1), 65-69.

Tatman, A. W., & Huss, M. T. (2019b). Initial reliability and validity for the Critical Hire - Screen. Personnel Assessment and Decisions. In press.

Tatman, A. W., Kreamer, S., & Dix, M. (2014). Employee Screening and Selection in Community Corrections: A Comprehensive Process. Perspectives, 38(4), 116-126.

Wanek, J. E. (1999). Integrity and honesty testing: What do we know? How do we use it? International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 7(4), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00118

Weiss, P. A. (2010). Use of the PAI in personnel selection. In M. A. Blais, M.R. Baity, & C. J. Hopwood (Eds.), Clinical applications of the Personality Assessment Inventory (pp. 163-176). New York, NY, US: Routledge/Tayler & Francis Group.

Weiss, P. A., Hitchcock, J. H., Weiss, W. U., Rostow, C., & Davis, R. (2008). The Personality Assessment Inventory borderline, drug, and alcohol scales as predictors of overall performance in police officers: A series of exploratory analyses. Policing and Society, 18, 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460802091708

Weiss, W. U., Rostow, C., Davis, R., & Decoster-Martin, E. (2004). The Personality Assessment Inventory as a selection device for law enforcement personnel. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 19(2), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02813870

Weiss, W. U., & Weiss, P. A. (2010). Use of the Personality Assessment Inventory in police and security personnel selection. In P. A. Weiss (Ed.), Personality assessment in police psychology: A 21st century perspective (pp. 72-90). Springfield, IL, US: Charles Thomas.

Weiss, W. U., Zehner, S. N., Davis, R. D., Rostow, C., & Decoster-Martin, E. (2005). Problematic police performance and the Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 20(1), 16-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02806703




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v10i1.16170

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.

Copyright © Macrothink Institute   ISSN 2162-3058

'Macrothink Institute' is a trademark of Macrothink Institute, Inc.