Effects of Industry-University Collaboration on Enterprises’ Intellectual Capital: A Study of Hi-Tech Industries in Zhejiang, China

Ran Li, Eksiri Niyomsilp

Abstract


This study aims to explore the impact of industry-university collaboration on enterprises’ intellectual capital. From the perspective of industry-university collaboration relationship management, to explore the influence of different industry-university collaboration relationship on the enterprises’ intellectual capital. Survey was used to collect the data from 406 Zhejiang province hi-tech enterprises’ entrepreneur and senior executives of the industry-university collaboration project using purposive sampling. Quantitative methods were used to analyze the variables and to test hypothesis.

Industry-university collaboration itself is a systematic project that needs close collaboration and coordination between the society and relevant units. The relationship between universities and enterprises plays an important role in collaboration. It has become an important obstacle of industry-university collaboration and a restriction factor of knowledge transfer. Therefore, industry-university collaboration cross-organizational management has gradually become a research hotpots for scholars. Taking high-tech enterprises in Zhejiang province as an example, this study studies the different effects of industry-university collaborative relations on enterprises’ intellectual capital from the perspective of industry-university collaborative relations, and improves enterprises’ intellectual capital through scientific and effective management of industry-university collaborative relations. On the basis of Tijssen, Perkmann, Walsh and other research achievements, this study divides the industry-university collaboration into two types of relationship: related type and transactional type. Quantitative research method is adopted to analyze the variables and verify the hypothesis. According to the data analysis results, draw a conclusion: Industry-university collaboration relationship should be based on the related relationship, the enterprise with strong related relationship has higher intellectual capital performance. Finally, according to the research results, some Suggestions on the management of industry-university collaborative relationship are put forward for the reference of local governments and future researchers.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bjerregard. (2014). Syncytin-1 in differentiating human myoblasts: relationship to caveolin-3 and myogenin. Cell and tissue research, 357(1), 355-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-014-1930-9

Boardman. (2008). Public—Private Partnerships: Eight Rules for Governments. Public Works Management & Policy, 13(2), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X08323843

Bonaccorsi, A., & Piccaluga, A. (1994). A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university‐industry relationships. R&D Management, 24(3), 229-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00876.x

Daghfous. (2004). Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive best practices. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 69(2), 21.

Gassol. (2007). The effect of university culture and stakeholders’ perceptions on university–business linking activities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(5), 489-507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9035-1

Galbraith. (2000). A services‐marketing perspective on e‐retailing: implications for e‐retailers and directions for further research. Internet Research.

Johnson. (2008). SNAP: a web-based tool for identification and annotation of proxy SNPs using HapMap. Bioinformatics, 24(24), 2938-2939. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn564

Nonaka, & Takeuchi. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford university press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)81509-3

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1996). OECD employment outlook: July 1996. OECD, Paris, France.

Porter, G. (1999). Trade competition and pollution standards: “race to the bottom” or “stuck at the bottom”. The Journal of Environment & Development, 8(2), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/107049659900800203

Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International journal of management reviews, 9(4), 259-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x

Petty, R., & Guthrie, J. (2000). Intellectual capital literature review. Journal of intellectual capital. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930010348731

Tijssen. (2006). Universities and industrially relevant science: Towards measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation. Research Policy, 35(10), 1569-1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.025




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v10i1.16548

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.

Copyright © Macrothink Institute   ISSN 2162-3058

'Macrothink Institute' is a trademark of Macrothink Institute, Inc.