Pilot Study, Does It Really Matter? Learning Lessons from Conducting a Pilot Study for a Qualitative PhD Thesis

Nashwa Ismail, Gary Kinchin, Julie-Ann Edwards


A Pilot Study (PS) is a small-scale research project conducted before the final full-scale study. A PS helps researchers to test in reality how likely the research process is to work, in order to help them decide how best to conduct the final research study. In piloting a study, a researcher can identify or refine a research question, discover what methods are best for pursuing it, and estimate how much time and what resources will be necessary to complete the larger final version of the study. There is, however, a paucity in literature that focuses on using, reading and representing PSs. This article discusses the importance of a PS to test and identify how methods and ideas would work in practice when undertaking a qualitative PhD thesis. The proposed PS in this paper addressed many challenges, and the researcher reflected on different perspectives of their work including ethical, cultural, social and professional issues. By the end of the PhD thesis, undertaken with the guidance of the PS, it was found that a well-conducted PS, giving a clear list of aims and objectives within a formal framework, can encourage methodological rigour and ensure the validity of both the study itself and the methodology applied. The objectives of this paper are thus threefold: first, to identify the issues within a specific qualitative PS prior to conducting the final study; second, to address the researcher’s reflections on these findings and finally, to share the experiences and knowledge that a PS can be expected to bring.

Full Text:



Abdallah, S., & Albadri, F. (2010). ICT Acceptance, Investment and Organization: Cultural Practices and Values in the Arab World. New York: Hershey.

Al-Suleimany, M. S. N. (2009). Psychology of Arab Management Thinking. Canada: Victoria. BC.

Connelly, L. M. (2008). Pilot Studies. Medsurg Nursing, 17(6), 411-2. PMID: 19248407

Crossman, A. (2007). Pilot Study, An Overview, Social sciences. Retrieved July 11, 2017, from https://www.thoughtco.com/pilot-study-3026449

Baker, T. L. (1994). Doing Social Research (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Designs (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

De Bono, E. (1999). Six Thinking Hats, New York: Back Bay Books.

De Vaus DA. (1993). Surveys in Social Research (3rd ed.). UCL Press: London.

Frankland, J., & Bloor, M. (1999). Some issues arising in the systematic analysis of focus group material. In R. Barbour, & J. Kitzinger (Eds), Developing

Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory & Practice. Sage: London.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1). https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1525822X05279903

Holloway, I. (1997). Basic Concepts for Qualitative Research. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

Hurn, B. J., & Tomalin, B. (2013). Cross-Cultural Communication: Theory and Practice. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jakobovits, L. A., & Lambert, W. E. (1962). Semantic satiation in an addition task.” Canadian Journal of Psychology, 16, 112-19. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083238

Janghorban, R., Latifnejad, R., & Ali Taghipour, A. (2014). Pilot Study in Qualitative Research: The Roles and Values. Journal of Hayat, 19(4), (ISSN 3-2014).

Kim, y. (2010). The Pilot Study in Qualitative Inquiry Identifying Issues and Learning Lessons for Culturally Competent Research. Qualitative Social Work, 10(2), 190-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325010362001

Padgett, Deborah K. (2008). Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Peat, J., Mellis, C., Williams, K., & Xuan, W. (2002). Health Science Research: A Handbook of Quantitative Methods, London: Sage.

Prescott, P. A., & Soeken, K. L. (1989). The potential uses of pilot work. Nursing Research, 38, 60-2.

Sampson, Helen. (2004). Navigating the Waves: The Usefulness of a Pilot in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research, 4(3), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794104047236

Teijlingen, V., & Hundley, V. (2001). The Importance of Pilot Studies. Social Research. Retrieved August 15, 2017, from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU35.html

Teijlingen, V, E., Rennie, A. M., Hundley, V., & Graham, W. (2001). The importance of conducting and reporting Pilot Studies: the example of the Scottish Births Survey. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34, 289-295. http://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01757.x

Teijlingen, V., & Hundley, V. (2002). The importance of pilot studies. Nursing Standard, 16(40), 33-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns2002.

Teijlingen, V. E., Rennie, A. M., Hundley, V., & Graham, W. (2002). The Role of Pilot Studies in Midwifery Research. Midwives: The Official Journal of the Royal College of Midwives, 5(11), 372-374.

Thabane, L., Ma, J., Chu, R., Cheng, J., Ismaila, A., Rios, L., Robson, R., Thabane, M., Giangregorio, L., & Goldsmith, C. (2010). A tutorial on Pilot Studies: the what, why and how, BMC Medical Research. BMC Medical Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-1

Thapar-Björkert, S., & Henry, M. (2004). Reassessing the Research Relationship: Location, Position and Power in Fieldwork Accounts. Social Research Methodology, 7(5), 363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1364557092000045294

Verma, S. (2005). Body Language Your Success Mantra: Your Success Mantra. New Delhi: Educa Books

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijssr.v6i1.11720


  • There are currently no refbacks.

International Journal of Social Science Research (Online ISSN: 2327-5510) E-mail: ijssr@macrothink.org

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.

Copyright © Macrothink Institute   ISSN 2327-5510