Where There Is a Way, There Is No Will! The Dichotomy between State Capacity and Quality of Public Spending in Brazil and Spain

Marco Aurelio Marques Ferreira, Carmen Pineda Nebot, Daiane Medeiros Roque Ferreira

Abstract


The analytical basis of this work relies on the disclosure of the relationship patterns between budgetary capacity and human development, providing the argument that sometimes “where there is a way, there is no will”. The argument provided is that the budgetary capacity can be either spoiled by the quality of public administration, by lack commitment or even by money displacement. Thus, we mean that sometimes the public managers, especially the mayors, may fail to convert a satisfactory budget conditions in public product and services aligned to contribute to human development. The purpose of this study is to investigate these dimensions regarding local governments of Brazil and Spain, considering the advantages of the differences and similarities between these countries on many issues. Among the main findings a curious fact has been observed, many municipalities with a great budgetary capacity show low quality of services and products provided to the citizens.  The results highlighted several factors, which affect the relationship between municipal budget and human development. These factors could be considered by policymakers to build more equitable resource redistribution policies and to improve the quality of public spending in local government.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ades, A., & Di Tella, R. (1997). The New Economics of Corruption: a Survey and Some New Results. Political Studies, 45, 496-515. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00093

Alesina, A., & Glaeser, E. L. (2004). Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199267669.001.0001

Anderson, C. H., & Tverdova, Y. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of PoliticalScience, 47, 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00007

Bannister, F. (2007). The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons. Int. Review of Administrative Sciences, 73, 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852307077959

Bowler, S., & Karp, J. A. (2004). Politicians, scandals, and trust in government. Political Behavior, 26(3), 271-287. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POBE.0000043456.87303.3a

Brown, T. L., Potoski, M., &Van Slyke, D. M. (2006). Managing Public Service Contracts: Aligning Values, Institutions, and Markets. Public Administration Review, 66, 323-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00590.x

Castles, F. G. (2004). The future of the welfare state: Crisis myths and crisis realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199270171.001.0001

Coelho, F. S., Crozatti, J., & Silva, V. C. (2015) Para onde vai o dinheiro público: casos de discrepância entre receita corrente per capita e desenvolvimento municipal no Brasil. Relatório de Pesquisa. EACH/USP. 51p.

Della Porta, D., &Vanucci, A. (1997). The ‘Perverse Effects’ of Political Corruption. Political Studies, 45, 516-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00094

Dhont, T., & Heylen, F. (2008). Why do europeans work (much) less? It is taxes and government spending. Economic Inquiry, 46(2), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00071.x

Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.09.001

Dometrius, N., & Sigelman, L. (1984). Assessing Progress toward Affirmative Action Goals in State and Local Government: A New Benchmark. Public Administration Review, 44(3), 241-246. https://doi.org/10.2307/975487

Dreher, A., & Herzfeld, T. (2005). The Economic Costs of Corruption: A Survey and New Evidence. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.734184

Ferreira, M. A. M., & Pineda, C. (2014). Desafíos y limitaciones en el proceso de Datos abiertos: lecciones a partir de las experiencias de Brasil y España. Proceedings of Congreso Internacional en Gobierno, Administración y Políticas Públicas, Madrid – Spain, 5.

FIRJAN (2014). - Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. IFDM. Rio de Janeiro: FIRJAN.

Gandelman, N., Piani, G., & Ferre, Z. (2012). Neighborhood Determinants of Quality of Life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(3), 547-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9278-2

Ghosh, S. (2010). Does Political Competition Matter for Economic Performance? Evidence from Sub-national Data saibal ghosh political competition and economic performance. Political Studies, 58(5), 1030-1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00823.x

Goldsmith, A. A. (1999). Slapping the Grasping Hand: Correlates of Political Corruption in Emerging Markets. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(4), 865–883. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1999.tb03398.x

Hodgson, G. M., & Jiang, S. (2007). The economics of corruption and the corruption of economics: an institutionalist perspective. Journal of Economic Issues, 41(4), 1043-1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2007.11507086

Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and politics in global markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226356495.001.0001

Iversen, T., & Stephens, J. D. (2008). Partisan politics, the welfare state and the three worlds of human capital formation. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4–5), 600–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007313117

Janssen, D., Rotthier, S., & Snijkers, K. (2004). If you measure it, they will score: An assessment of international eGovernment benchmarking. Information Polity, 9, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2004-0051

King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Lind, J. T. (2005). Why Is There So Little Redistribution?. Nordic Journal of Political Economy, 31, 111–25.

Marinho, E., & Jorge Neto, P. M. (1999). Gastos públicos e condições de vida nos municípios do estado do Ceará. Revista de Administração Pública, 33(3), 139-160.

Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (1998). The State of the States: Performance-Based Budgeting Requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review, 58(1), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/976891

Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Governing the Hollow State. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024273

Minayo, M. C. D. S., Hartz, Z. M. D. A., & Buss, P. M. (2000). Qualidade de vida e saúde: um debate necessário. Ciência & saúde coletiva, 5, 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232000000100002

Mo, P. H. (2001). Corruption and Economic Growth. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29, 66-79. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.2000.1703

Nketiah-Amponsah, E. (2009). Public spending and economic growth: evidence from Ghana (1970-2004). Development Southern Africa, 26(3), 477-497. https://doi.org/10.1080/03768350903086846

Pharr, S. J., & Putnam, R. D. (2000). Disaffected Democracies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Prud’Homme, R. (1995). On the dangers of decentralilization. World Bank Research Observer, 10(2), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/10.2.201

Quinn, J. J. (2008). The Effects of Majority State Ownership of Significant Economic Sectors on Corruption: A Cross-Regional Comparison. International Interactions, 34(1), 84-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050620701883579

Ramírez-Alujas, Á., & Villoria, M. (2012). Innovaciones de raíz democrática en la Administración: ¿recuperando legitimidad ante la crisis?. Ekonomiaz, (80), 20-45.

Rezende, F. C. (2011). Razões emergentes para a validade dos estudos de caso na ciência política comparada. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, (6), 297-337. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-33522011000200012

Santerre, R. E. (2009). Jurisdiction Size and Local Public Health Spending. Health Services Research, 44(6), 2148-2166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01006.x

Tanzi, V. (1994). Corruption, governmental activities and markets. IMF Working, 94/99. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451852202.001

Vila i Vila, J. (2013). Determinantes de la transparencia contable en los municipios. Auditoria Pública, 60, 57-64.

Villoria, M., & Jiménez, F. (2012). La corrupción en España (2004-2010): datos, percepción y efectos. REIS, 138, 109-134.

Waterman, R. W., & Meier, K. J. (1998). Principal-Agent Models: An Expansion?. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 173–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024377

World Bank. (1997). World Development Report: The State in a Changing Society, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

World Bank. (2006). Anti-corruption [online]. Retrieved July 30, 2015, from http://web.worldbank.org/wbsite/external/topics/extpublicsectorandgovernance/extanticorruption/0,menu PK: 384461~pagePK:149018~piPK:149093~th eSitePK:384455,00.html.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v8i4.13224

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Journal of Public Administration and Governance  ISSN 2161-7104

Copyright © Macrothink Institute

'Macrothink Institute' is a trademark of Macrothink Institute, Inc.

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.