Evaluation of Good Governance Principles Implementation Using Polling Data

Olena Akimova, Anna Ishchenko, Anatolii Melnychenko


The article deals with the peculiarities of polling data application in evaluating public authorities' adherence to the good governance principles. Opportunities and threats of soft and polling data implementation are highlighted considering the possible interests of the main stakeholders of the governance process. Evaluation of 12 good governance principles realization on public opinion basis has been analyzed, while the most relevant methods of raw data collecting have been identified, taking into account the peculiarities of main target audiences: citizens, civil servants and civil society organizations representatives.

Full Text:



Principles of Good Governance and European Label of Governance Excellence (ELoGE) (n.d) [Online] Available: https://www.coe.int/en/web/good-governance/12-principles-and-eloge. (October 25, 2019).

Arndt, C., & Oman, C. (2006). Uses and Abuses Of Governance Indicators. [Online] Available: http://lst-iiep.iiep-unesco.org/cgi-bin/wwwi32.exe/[in=epidoc1.in]/?t2000=022996/(100). (November 4, 2019).

Bangura, Y., & Larbi, G. (2006). Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries: Capacity Challenges to Improve Services. http://lst-iiep.iiep-unesco.org/cgi-bin/wwwi32.exe/[in=epidoc1.in]/?t2000=025533/(100). (September 27, 2019).

Berger, G. (2003). Reflections on Governance: Power Relations and Policy Making in Regional Sustainable Development. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 5(3), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908032000154160

Besancon, M. (2003). Good governance rankings: the art of measurement. World Peace Foundation Reports, 36, 11-34, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Danylyshyn, B. (2016) Decentralization in EU countries: lessons for Ukraine. Regional economy, 1, 5-11.

den Heyer, G. (2011). New public management: A strategy for democratic police reform in transitioning and developing countries. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 34, 419-433. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511111157492

Garbarino, S., & Holland, J. (2009). Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Impact Evaluation and Measuring Results. [Online] Available: http://www.gsdrc.org/docs/open/eirs4.pdf (November 4, 2019).

Graham, J., Amos, B., & Plumptre, T. (2003). Principles for Good Governance in the 21st century. Policy Brief. Institute On Governance. 15. [Online] Available: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/122197/pa_governance2.pdf (November 28, 2019).

Guidance Note for Assessing Rule of Law in Public Administration. (2015). [Online] Available: https://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/Democratic%20Governance/Public%20Administration/Assessing-Respect-for-Rule-of-Law-Guidance_note.pdf (October 5, 2019).

Huk, A. (2018). Benchmarkinh dobroho vryaduvannya: praktychnyy posibnyk [Good Governance Benchmarking: A Practical Guide]. Kyiv: Yuston. p.60.

Ivanyna, M., & Shah, A. (2011). Citizen-centric governance indicators: measuring and monitoring governance by listening to the people. CESifo Forum, 1, 59-71.

Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2008). Governance Indicators: Where Are We, Where Should We Be Going? The World Bank Research Observer, 23(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkm012https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkm012

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2006). Governance Matters V: Governance Indicators for 1996-2005. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 4012. [Online] Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=930847 (November 25, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3630

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido, P. (1999). Governance Matters. Policy Research Working Paper 2196. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. p. 68.

Petry, F., & Birch, L. (2011). The use of public opinion research by government: insights from American and Canadian Research. [Online] Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256538643 The use of public opinion research by government insights from American and Canadian Research (November 4, 2019).

Rochefort, D., & Boyer, C. (1988). Use of Public Opinion Data in Public Administration: Health Care Polls. Public administration review, 48, 649-60. https://doi.org/10.2307/975767

Sharma, P. K., & Rathore, V. S. (2020). Performance Analysis of E-Governance Citizen-Centric Services Through E-Mitra in Rajasthan. In: Pant M., Sharma T., Basterrech S., Banerjee C. (Eds) Performance Management of Integrated Systems and its Applications in Software Engineering. Asset Analytics (Performance and Safety Management) (pp. 175-182). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8253-6_16

Shpachuk, V. (2019). Reform of the public administration system in Ukraine at the territorial level in the context of decentralization. In L. V. Honiukova, V. G. Hornyk, V. V. Karlova, S. O. Kravchenko (Eds.), Development of mechanisms of good governance in Ukraine (pp.88-121). Lviv-Toruń: Liha-Pres. https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-114-8/88-121

Stojanovic, I., Ateljevic, J., & Stević, S. (2016). Good Governance as a Tool of Sustainable Development. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 5, 558-573. http://dx.doi.org10.14207/ejsd.2016.v5n4p558. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2016.v5n4p558

Tampieri, L. (2005). Performance Evaluation Indexes in Public Administration Some issues of their actual usefulness. Central European Public Administration, 3(2), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.v3i2.51https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.v3i2.51

Vorobyova, O. (2015). Suchasni upravlinsʹki modeli new public management i good governance ta yikh zaprovadzhennya v Ukrayini [Modern governance models of new public management and good governance and their implementation in Ukraine]. Efficiency of public governance, 42, 230-234.

Wijkman, A. (1998). Does sustainable development require good governance? UN Chronicl, 35(1), 86-88, Spring.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v9i4.15784

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Journal of Public Administration and Governance  ISSN 2161-7104

Copyright © Macrothink Institute

'Macrothink Institute' is a trademark of Macrothink Institute, Inc.

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.