Citizen-Centric Public Service Satisfaction During Pandemic Outbreak: A Measurement Model

Siti Daleela Mohd Wahid, Siti Hajjar Mohd Amin, Abdul Jalil Mohamed Ali, Abdul Jalil Mohamed Ali, Aida Abdullah, Siti Mariam Ali

Abstract


Citizen-centricity satisfaction is a recent phenomenon spreading around the world. It is of growing interest to scholars and many papers are focused on this area. This paper aims at revealing factor that predict a citizen satisfaction during pandemic outbreak in public service delivery. A massive number of theories and past scholars have carried out studies on the factors influencing citizen satisfaction, which resulted in a list containing large volume of variables. There was a need to generalize factors that capable to form a universal citizen satisfaction model. This research utilizing citizen-centric demands of transformational government model as the theoretical foundation in citizen satisfaction in public service context. 346 citizens conveniently were selected as respondents, at the same time as information become amassed via online surveys. The information become then analyzed via the use of AMOS software.  The structural equation modelling (SEM) was executed to develop the measurement model. The results exhibit that goodness of fit, construct reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity achieved the overall fitness threshold to model citizen satisfaction. This research contributes to shed light on the literature via examining the elements of citizen-centric demands of transformational government model namely openness, responsiveness, transparency and participation in citizen satisfaction.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agbozo, E., & Spassov, K. (2018). Establishing efficient governance through data-driven e-government. Proceeding of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 662-664), Galway, Ireland: National University of Ireland Galway.

Avery, E. J., Graham, M., & Park, S. (2016). Planning makes (closer to) perfect: exploring United States’ local government officials’ evaluations of crisis management. Journal of contingencies and Crisis Management, 24(2), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12109

Awang, Z. (2015). SEM made simple: A gentle approach to learning Structural Equation Modeling. MPWS Rich Publication.

Black, J., & La Venture, K. (2018). The Human Factor to Profitability: Leveraging People-Centered Cultures as Meaningful Organizations. Public Integrity, 20(5), 444-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2017.1364949

Bowie, N. (2020, March 16). Malaysia loses its grip on Covid-19 outbreak. Asiatimes. Retrieved from https://asiatimes.com/2020/03/malaysia-loses-its-grip-on-covid-19-outbreak/

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Multivariate application series (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Cai, H., & Wang, K. (2006). Service oriented design method and practice for constructing citizen-centric public services. 2006 IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE'06) (pp. 536-540), Shanghai, China.

Das, R. K., & Mishra, H. (2018). Smart E-Governance and Sustainable Development: Strategic Alignment Assessment Framework. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp.690-692), Galway, Ireland: National University of Ireland Galway.

Fry, B. R., & Nigro, L. G. (1996). Max Weber and US public administration: the administrator as neutral servant. Journal of Management History, 2(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552529610105654

Giesbrecht, T., Scholl, H. J., & Schwabe, G. (2016). Smart advisors in the front office: Designing employee-empowering and citizen-centric services. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 669-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.05.005

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Porumbescu, G. A. (2017). Reconsidering the expectancy disconfirmation model. Three experimental replications. Public Management Review, 19(9), 1272-1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1282000

Hair, J., Black, W., Anderson, R., & Babin, B. (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.

Hood, C. (2001). New public management. In Sociology (pp. 12553-12555). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_89

Jakobsen, M., James, O., Moynihan, D., & Nabatchi, T. (2016). JPART Virtual Issue on Citizen-State Interactions in Public Administration Research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(4), e8-e15. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw031

Jun, D., Hagen, L., Lee, E., Lim, H., & Kim, D. (2018). How big data contributes to the building of citizen-centric smart cities: the case of Namyangju city in Korea (pp. 1-6). 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.

Kamaruddin, K. A., & MdNoor, N. (2017). Citizen-centric demand model for transformational government systems (pp.139). Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Langkawi, Malaysia.

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.

Kopackova, H. (2019). Reflexion of citizens' needs in city strategies: The case study of selected cities of Visegrad group countries [Article]. Cities, 84, 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.08.004

Kumar, A. (2019). Citizen-centric model of governmental entrepreneurship Transforming public service management for the empowerment of marginalized women. Transforming Government- People Process and Policy, 13(1), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-03-2018-0023

Kyakulumbye, S., Pather, S., & Jantjies, M. (2019). Towards design of citizen centric e-government projects in developing country context: the design-reality gap in Uganda. Small, 4, 11. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm070403

Ma, L., & Christensen, T. (2019). Government trust, social trust, and citizens’ risk concerns: Evidence from crisis management in China. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(2), 383-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1464478

Malchenko, Y. A., & Smirnova, M. M. (2019). What drives consumers smart? the challenge of adoption of smart city solutions. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2019.305

Malhotra, C. (2015). A Design Framework for Evolving a Citizen-Centric Information Society. In Handbook of Research on Cultural and Economic Impacts of the Information Society (pp. 25-41). IGI Global.

Marchezini, V. (2020). “What is a sociologist doing here?” An unconventional people-centered approach to improve warning implementation in the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00262-1

Ministry of Finance Malaysia. (2020). Perlaksanaan Pakej PRIHATIN Rakyat. https://pre2020.treasury.gov.my/flipbook/laksana1/

Misra, A., Misra, D. P., Mahapatra, S. S., & Biswas, S. (2018). Digital transformation model: analytic approach on participatory governance & community engagement in India (pp. 1-7). 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.

Mok, J. Y. (2020). Proposed non-linear relation between satisfaction with government performance and co-production: an initial empirical test. Public Management Review, 22(3), 432-451. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1599060

Naswir, R. Y., Maarop, N., Hasan, M., Daud, S., Samy, G. N., & Magalingam, P. (2019). Towards a conceptual model to evaluate usability of digital government services in Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(4), 313-322. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100438

Nor, N. B. M., Ismail, T. N. B. T., & Puteh, H. F. B. H. (2017). Discovering the Antecedents of Engagement for Citizen Centric Public Service Excellence. The 6th International Conference on Public Policy and Social Science (ICOPS) (pp. 809), Kedah, Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Mara.

OECD. (2019). Government at a Glance 2019. https://doi.org/doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/8ccf5c38-en

OECD, & ADB. (2019). Government at a Glance Southeast Asia 2019. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264305915-en

Osman, I. H., Anouze, A. L., Irani, Z., Al-Ayoubi, B., Lee, H., Balcı, A., Medeni, T. D., & Weerakkody, V. (2014). COBRA framework to evaluate e-government services: A citizen-centric perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 243-256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.009

Rådestad, C., & Larsson, O. (2020). Responsibilization in contemporary Swedish crisis management: expanding ‘bare life’biopolitics through exceptionalism and neoliberal governmentality. Critical Policy Studies, 14(1), 86-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2018.1530604

Reddick, C. G., Chatfield, A. T., & Ojo, A. (2017). A social media text analytics framework for double-loop learning for citizen-centric public services: A case study of a local government Facebook use. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 110-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.11.001

Robinson, M. (2015). From old public administration to the new public service: Implications for public sector reform in developing countries. https://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/capacity-development/

Robinson, S. E., Pudlo, J. M., & Wehde, W. (2019). The New Ecology of Tornado Warning Information: A Natural Experiment Assessing Threat Intensity and Citizen‐to‐Citizen Information Sharing. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 905-916. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13030

Sánchez-Teba, E. M., & Bermúdez-González, G. J. (2019). Are Smart-City Projects Citizen-Centered? Social Sciences, 8(11), 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8110309

Sanka, S. S., Jain, G., & Goondla, S. (2019). Electronic Citizen Service Delivery, MeeSeva-Telangana State, India (pp. 441-445). 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Melborne, Australia.

Sepasgozar, S. M. E., Hawken, S., Sargolzaei, S., & Foroozanfa, M. (2019). Implementing citizen centric technology in developing smart cities: A model for predicting the acceptance of urban technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.012

Sicilia, M., Guarini, E., Sancino, A., Andreani, M., & Ruffini, R. (2016). Public services management and co-production in multi-level governance settings [Article; Proceedings Paper]. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 8-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314566008

Sneiders, E., Gunawardena, L., Ngoga, S. R., Darayathna, R., & Byungura, J. C. (2018). Potential for Improving Public Services by Exploring Citizens’ Communication to Public Organizations (pp. 265-280). International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Song, M., Kim, M., & Favero, N. (2020). Social Class, Ingroup–Outgroup Comparison, and Citizen Evaluations: Is User Satisfaction Linked to Outcome Disparities? The American Review of Public Administration, 50(2), 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019874445

Van de Walle, S. (2004). Context-specific images of the archetypical bureaucrat: persistence and diffusion of the bureaucracy stereotype. Public Voices, 7(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.22140/pv.192

Van de Walle, S. (2016). When public services fail: a research agenda on public service failure. Journal of Service Management, 27(5), 831-846. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-04-2016-0092

Van de Walle, S. (2017). Explaining Citizen Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Public Services. In (pp. 227-241). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_11

Yong, J. S. (2004). Promoting Citizen-Centered Approaches to e-Government Programmes: Strategies and Perspectives from Asian Economies (pp. 6-8). Second APEC High-Level Symposium on e-Government, Acapulco, Mexico, Acapulco, Mexico.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v10i4.17586

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Journal of Public Administration and Governance  ISSN 2161-7104

Copyright © Macrothink Institute

'Macrothink Institute' is a trademark of Macrothink Institute, Inc.

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.