Political Leadership in Policy Implementation: Case Study of Rural Transport Accessibility in Kuala Krai, Kelantan, Malaysia

Maria Mohd Ismail, Raja Noriza Raja Ariffin

Abstract


Politics plays a major role in every aspect of the government development plan. Kelantan is an interesting case in understanding the different political leadership involved in the implementation process. This study reports how politics influenced the development of rural transport accessibility in Kuala Krai, Kelantan. In-depth interviews were conducted among 33 respondents; 13 policymakers from the federal, state and local level and 20 villagers covering all the three sub-districts in Kuala Krai, Kelantan, Malaysia. The findings were presented based on the emerging themes emerged from the analysis. The findings confirmed that politics is the primary mover in formulating and implementing any transport accessibility plan in the study area. The findings also provided ultimate insights for policymakers at multiple decision-making level involved in formulating and implementing for an accessible rural transport system for the rural communities.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Afegbua, S. I., & Adejwon, K. D. (2012). The challenges of leadership and governance in Africa. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(9), 141-157

Allison, G., & Zelikow, P. (1971). The Essence of Decisions: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crises. Boston: Little Brown & Co.

Barrett, S., & Fudge, C. (1981). Policy and Action: Essays on the implementation of public policy. Methuen, London.

Baumgartner, F. & B. Jones (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: Chicago of University Press.

Bekkers, V., Fenger, M., & Scholten, P. (2017). Public policy in action: Perspectives on the policy process. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing

Bowring, P. (2004, July 13). Philip Bowring: When the Malays cast their votes. International Herald Tribune Online.

Case, W. (1995). Malaysia: Aspects and audiences of legitimacy. ln M. Alagappa (Eds.), Political legitimacy in South East Asia (pp. 69-107). California: Stanford University Press.

Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (2019). The parliament of Kelantan, Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.cpahq.org/cpahq/core/parliamentinfo.aspx?committee=Kelantan.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed). California: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Crouch, H. (1992). Authoritarian trends, the UMNO split and the limits to state power. ln Joel S. Kahn & Francis Loh Kok Wah (Eds.), Fragmented vision: Culture and politics in contemporary Malaysia (pp. 21-43). Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

Dahl, R. (1961). Who governs?Power and democracy in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

de Oliveira, J. A. P. (2016). Bridging governmental relations in urban management: Cases of solid waste management and climate change in two Malaysian states. MIT-UTM Malaysia Sustainable Cities Program, 1-24.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fradette, M., & Michdaud, S. (1998). The power of corporate kinetics: Create the self-adapting, self-renewing, instant-action enterprise. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Hill, M. (1997). The policy process in the modern state (3rd ed). London: Prentice Hall.

Hood, C. C. (1976). The limits of administration. London: Wiley.

Kelantan State Structural Plan (2010-2020). Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia. Retrieved 10, February, 2018 from https://sgp1.digitaloceanspaces.com/proletarian-library/singapore-malaysia

Leeds, C. A. (1981). Political studies (3rd ed.). Plymouth: Macdonald & Evans.

Leswell, H. D. (1958). Politics: Who gets what, when how. New York: Meridian Books.

Lowi, T. J. (1964). American business, public policy, case studies and political theory. World Politics, 16(4), 677-715. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009452

Marsden, G., Frick, K. T., May, A. D., & Deakin, E. (2011). How do cities approach policy innovation and policy learning? A study of 30 policies in Northern Europe and North America. Transport Policy, 18, 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.10.006

Mohammed, N. (2007). Leadership and political culture: A brief look at the Malaysian political landscape. Journal of Administrative Science (JAS), 59-79.

Ngah, I. (2015). Towards sustainable rural development and planning in Malaysia. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Chapter1.pdf

Nice, D. C. (1987). Federalism: The politics of intergovernmental relations. United States: St. Martin's Press.

Paige, G. D. (1977). The scientific study of political leadership. New York: The Free Press/Collier MacMillan Publishers.

Parsons, W. (1995). Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Chelthenham: Edward Elgar.

Porter, G. (2013). Transport services and their impact on poverty and growth in rural Sub-Saharan Africa. United Kingdom: University of Durham.

Raja Noriza, R. A. (2006). The implementation of urban transport policy in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. (Doctoral dissertation).

Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1979). The conditions of effective implementation: A guide to accomplishing policy objectives. Policy Analysis, 5(4), 481-504.

Sarkar, A. K., & Ghosh, D. (2000). Identification and prioritization of access problems in rural areas. Development Southern Africa, 17(1), 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/03768350050003479

Silong, A. D., Mohamad, M., Hassan, Z., & Ariff, I. (2008). Changing roles and competencies for effective public sector leadership. Jurnal Pengurusan Awam, 7(1), 27-46.

Tam, W. Wah. (2008). Developing collaborative leaders for a highly diverse society. Jurnal Pengurusan Awam, 7(1), 47-62.

Tsumagari, M. (2007). Rural transport: A review of 15 years of world bank landing from 1992 to 2006. Energy, Water & Transport Department. Washington, DC: Author.

Weiss, M. L. (2003). Mengatasi politik berasaskan ras di Malaysia: Menentukan norma untuk kerjasama berbilang etnik yang lebih mendalam. In Ho Khai Leong & James Chin (Eds.) Pentadbiran Mahathir: Prestasi dan Krisis dalam Pemerintahan (edisi Bahasa Melayu) (pp. 68-110). Singapore: Times Media Private Limited.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v11i1.17961

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Journal of Public Administration and Governance  ISSN 2161-7104

Copyright © Macrothink Institute

'Macrothink Institute' is a trademark of Macrothink Institute, Inc.

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.