Informal Practices in Public Administrations in Cameroon

Michael TAOYANG WARAI

Abstract


The article questions the practices of violation of the law and the link between illegality and administrative practices, with a focus on administrative services. In this paper, I propose to study the experience of Cameroon, a country where formality and informality work hand in hand. Precisely, administrative practices have for some time seen the proliferation of unconventional practices in the management of administrative services. The assessment is the use of informality that rub shoulders with the formal rules established by the legislator. The informal management of administrative services can be explained on the one hand by the state crisis which results in the state registry struggling to take. Administrative burdens as an institutional factor should not also be overlooked as an explanatory factor for this practice. Informality, therefore, becomes an alternative to bypass regulatory frameworks. The objective of this article is to stimulate reflection on the role that informality can play in administrative practices in Cameroon. Starting from the principle of methodological individualism, we demonstrate that informality is a vector of underdevelopment, and this way of doing must retain the attention of governments to overcome this practice.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, P. (1978). L’État absolutiste. Ses origines et ses voies, Paris, La Découverte.

Badie, B., & Birnbaum, P. (1978). Sociologie de l’État. Paris, Grasset.

Badie, B. (1993). État importé occidentalisation de l’ordre politique. Cases, Politique étrangère, 3(58), 802-803.

Bayart, J.-F. (1979). L’État au Cameroun, Paris, Presses de la Fondation nationale des sciences Politiques.

Bennafla, K. (2015). Informalité. Notion à la une de Géoconfluences, [En ligne : http://geoconfluences.ens-lyon.fr/informations-scientifiques/a-la-une/notion-a-la-une/notion-a-la-une-informalite/accessed September 19, 2020].

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life, New York, John Wiley and Sons.

Blau, P. M., & Scott, W. R. (1962). Formal organizations: A comparative approach. San Francisco: Chandler

Bour, J. (2018). Clientélisme politique et recommandation, Rennes, Presses universitaires de Rennes.

Bratton, M., & Walle, N. de V. (1997). Democratic Experiment in Africa. Regimes Transitionsin Comparative Perspective, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174657

Briquet, J.-L., & Sawicki, F. (1998). Le clientélisme politique dans les sociétés contemporaines », Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.

Collection Afrique Politique. (2005). Gouverner les sociétés africaines : acteurs et institutions, Paris, Karthala.

Crozier, M. (1963). Le Phénomène bureaucratique, Paris, Seuil.

Crozier, M. (1970). La Société bloquée, Paris, Seuil.

Dalton, M. (1959). Men who manage, New York, John Wiley & Sons.

Delia, D. P., & Mény, Y. (dir.). (1995). Démocratie et corruption en Europe, Paris, La Découverte.

Derumez. (2017). Les grands auteurs en Management, Caen, EMS.

Eisenstadt, S. N. (1973). Tradition, Change and Modernity, New York, Willey.

Foucault, M. (1974). Dits et écrits I, « Sur la sellette », Paris, Gallimard.

Gaudemet, Y. (1994). Les actions administratives informelles. Revue internationale de droit comparé, 46(2), 645-654. https://doi.org/10.3406/ridc.1994.4894

Geoffroy, F. (2014). Penser l’informel. Non-concept ou méta-concept pour le management ? , France, Université de Picardie Jules Verne. pp. 1-17.

Heggstad, K. K., & Froystad, M. (2011). Les fondements de l’intégrité dans la passation des Marchés. Bergen, Chr. Michelsen Institute, 16, 1-47.

Jacquemont, P. (2016). L’Afrique des possibles : les défis de l’émergence, Paris, Karthala.

Labro, C. (dir.). (2010). Dictionnaire Hachette, Paris, CEDEX.

Lautier, B. C. de M., & Morice, A. (1991). L’État et l’informel, Paris, L’Harmattan.

Litterer, J. A. (1963). Organizations: Structure and behavior, New York, John Wiley & Sons.

Médard, J.-F. (1976). Le rapport de clientèle, du phénomène social à l'analyse politique. Revue Française de Science Politique, 26, 103-131. https://doi.org/10.3406/rfsp.1976.393655

Médard, J.-F. (1991). L’État néo-patrimonial en Afrique noire, Paris, Karthala.

Médard, J.-F. (2000). Clientélisme politique et corruption. Tiers-Monde, 41(161), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.3406/tiers.2000.1051

Nwabuzor, A. (2005). Corruption and Development: New Initiatives in Economic Openness and Strengthened Rule of Law. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1- 2), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-3402-3

Schein, E. H. (2017). La culture organisationnelle. Charreire, S., Les Grands Auteurs en Management, Caen, EMS, 453-471. https://doi.org/10.3917/ems.charr.2017.01.0453

Titi Nwel, P. (1999). De la corruption au Cameroun, Yaoundé, GERDDES-Cameroon, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Cameroun.

Van Tatenhove, J., Mak, J., & Liefferink, D. (2006). “The inter-play between formal and informal”, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 7(1), 8-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705850600839470

Wallerstein. (1974). The Modern World System. Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Economy in the Sixteenth Century, New York, Academic Press.

Weber, M. (1971). Wisdom and science in sociology. Schneider, L., The sociological quarterly, 12(4), 462-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1971.tb01375.x




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v11i1.17986

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Journal of Public Administration and Governance  ISSN 2161-7104

Copyright © Macrothink Institute

'Macrothink Institute' is a trademark of Macrothink Institute, Inc.

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.