Comparison of Process Theories to Content Theories in Motivating Workforces

Haekyung Rhee

Abstract


Motivation theories have been classified into process theory and content theory in the literature. The effectiveness of each of them has been dealt with only in the textbooks and they were not experimented to see their applicability in the real workplace environment. In this essay, to observe this sort of applicability we resort to well known Working Stiff Workplace Diaries in order to find out how WSDs as a grass root type of employees’ sentiment and morale assert which particular one of the two major motivation theories. The whole ten diaries supplied by the Weblab were taken into the experiment. The methodology we have taken is that we measured the affinity of each of diaries to the two categories of motivation theories, that is, process theory and content theory. As a result, WSDs are found to be supportive towards content theory more than towards process theory. This shows that content theory prevails over process theory in the real workplace environment. Thus it seems to me that the issue such as whether process theories are superior to content theories must be reviewed and judged for its validity against these sort of real-world stories on experiences of real-world workforces. Otherwise, the discussion of the issue might result in of no use, since there would be lack or short of real world evidences of vindication.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Handy, C. (1993), Understanding organizations, Penguin Books, Fourth Edition, 1993.

Lawler, E. and Porter, L. (1967), “Antecedent attitudes of effective managerial performance”, International Conference on Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, pp. 122-142.

Maslow, A. (1943). “A theory of human motivation”, Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-96.

Weblab, Working Stiff Workplace Diaries, retrieved from http://www.weblab.org/workingstiff, also Valentino, D. (2014), Working Stiff Workplace Diaries, Amazon Digital Services LLC.

Scott, J. E. and Vessey, I. (2002), Managing risks in enterprise systems implementations, Communications of the ACM 45(4).

Bygstad, B. (2003), The implementation puzzle of CRM systems in knowledge-based organizations, Information Resources Management Journal 16(4), 33-39.

Locke, E. A. and Latham, G. P. (2006), New directions in Goal-Setting Theory, Sage Journals, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v9i4.15620

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.

Copyright © Macrothink Institute   ISSN 2162-3058

'Macrothink Institute' is a trademark of Macrothink Institute, Inc.