Designing Remuneration Systems of Organizations for Sustainable HRM: The Core Characteristics of an Emerging Field

Gintautas Radvila, Violeta Šilingienė


Successful business trends in the 21st century cover new factors where economic viability and sustainability should address not only the economic criterion, but also the human managerial one. This leads to the creation of effective sustainable work systems including remuneration systems as a part of sustainable human resource management. The basic research object of sustainable work systems is work intensity, which covers many possible approaches including remuneration systems of organizations. Effective remuneration systems enhance the performance and contribution of employees by controlling labor cost, motivating employees and involving them in organizational processes. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence for the sustainability of both theoretical and empirical research of remuneration systems. This article pursues validating theoretical concepts related to sustainable human resource management (SHRM) and remuneration systems by empirical disclosure of the expression of SHRM principles in the characteristics of remuneration systems. The purpose of this paper is to reveal the characteristics of remuneration systems of organizations in real SHRM in enterprises in Lithuania. In order to achieve this, a qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 21 corporate HR managers. The study empirically substantiated the relationship between the principles of sustainable human resource management and remuneration characteristics. Results disclosed that as many as 10 of the 12 SHRM principles allow to identify the remuneration system as a sustainable work system. All the identified characteristics of the remuneration system reveal various principles of SHRM through different features and indicators. Furthermore, it confirms the economic, social and environmental nature of sustainable remuneration systems.

Full Text:



Abraham, M. (2017). Pay formalization revisited: Considering the effects of manager gender and discretion on closing the gender wage gap. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 29-54.

Armstrong, M. (2009). Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice. London: Kogan Page.

Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2017). Armstrongs handbook of human resource management practice. London: Kogan Page.

Armstrong, M., & Cummins, A. (2011). The reward management toolkit: a step-by-step guide to designing and delivering pay and benefits. London: Kogan Page.

Armstrong, M., & Murlis, H. (2007). Reward management A handbook of reumeration strategy and practice. London: Kogan Page.

Babecký, J., Galuščák, K., & Žigraiová, D. (2017). Wage dynamics and financial performance: Evidence from Czech firms. Czech National Bank, Research Department.

Becker, W. (2011). Are You Leading a Socially Responsible and Sustainable Human Resource Function? People & Strategy, 34(1), 18. Available: (April 9, 2020).

Becker, W. S., & Smith, R. J. (2012). Social and Environmental Responsibility, Sustainability, and Human Resource Practices. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Biswas, B. D. (2013). Compensation and benefit design. USA: Financial Times Prentice.

Brundtland Report. (1987). Encyclopedia of Environment and Society.

Costa, P. L., Passos, A. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Team work engagement: A model of emergence. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(2), 414–436.

Docherty, P., Forslin, J., & Shani, A. B. (Eds.). (2002). Creating sustainable work systems: emerging perspectives and practice. Psychology Press.

Dubinas, V. (1996). Darbo užmokesčio formos ir sistemos Europos šalyse. Vilnius: Lietuvos informacijos institutas.

Ehnert, I., Parsa, S., Roper, I., Wagner, M., & Muller-Camen, M. (2015). Reporting on sustainability and HRM: a comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by the worlds largest companies. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(1). 88–108.

Eijnatten, van, F. M. (2000). From intensive to sustainable work systems: The quest for a new paradigm of work. In M. Sapir (Ed.), Conference proceedings: Working without limits? Re-organising work and reconsidering workers' health: Plenary sessions. (pp. 47-66). Brussel.

Favilukis, J., & Lin, X. (2016). Does wage rigidity make firms riskier? Evidence from long-horizon return predictability. Journal of Monetary Economics, 78, 80-95.

Ferreira, P. (2019). Market competition and executive pay. IZA World of Labor.

Flannery, T. P., Hofrichter, D. A., & Platten, P. E. (1996). People, performance, and pay: dynamic compensation for changing organizations. New York: Free Press.

Fuller, S., & Cooke, L. P. (2018). Workplace Variation in Fatherhood Wage Premiums: Do Formalization and Performance Pay Matter? Work, Employment and Society, 32(4), 768-788.

Greenwood, M. R., & Simmons, J. (2004). A Stakeholder Approach to Ethical Human Resource Management. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 23(3), 3–23.

Gryglewicz, S., Hartman-Glaser, B., & Zheng, G. (2018). Growth Options, Incentives, and Pay-for-Performance: Theory and Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Hahn, T., & Figge, F. (2011). Beyond the bounded instrumentality in current corporate sustainability research: toward an inclusive notion of profitability. Journal of Business Ethics. 104. 325-345.

Henderson, R. I. (2006). Compensation management in a knowledge-based world. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Holmström, B. (2017). Pay for performance and beyond. American Economic Review, 107(7). 1753-77.

Kira, M. (2003). From Good Work to Sustainable Development - Human Resources Consumption and Regeneration in the Post-Bureaucratic Working Life (PhD dissertation). Industriell ekonomi och organisation, Stockholm. Available: (April 9, 2020).

Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., & Dysvik, A. (2018). Individual variable pay for performance, incentive effects, and employee motivation. In annual meeting of the Academy of Management. Chicago, USA.

Larkin, I. (2019). Strategic compensation: a critique and research agenda. Handbook of Research on Strategic Human Capital Resources Glos: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. p. 403-424.

Legge, K. (1998). Is HRM ethical? Can HRM be ethical? In M. Parker (Ed.), Ethics and organizations. London: Sage. p. 150-172.

Lélé, S. M. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19(6). 607–621.

Lipinskienė, D. (2012). Motyvuojanti atlygio sistema: vadovėlis. Kaunas: Technologija.

Macke, J., & Genari, D. (2018). Systematic Literature Review on Sustainable Human Resource Management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 806-815.

Mačernytė-Panomariovienė, I. (2003). Apmokėjimas už darbą ir jo užtikrinimas: mokomasis leidinys. Vilnius: LTU leidybos centras.

Mäkikangas, A., Aunola, K., Seppälä, P., & Hakanen, J. (2016). Work engagement-team performance relationship: shared job crafting as a moderator. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(4), 772–790.

Martocchio, J. J. (2013). Strategic compensation: a human resource management approach. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Mayring, P. H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Monographie. Klagenfurt.

Milkovich G. T., Newman J. M., & Gerhart B. (2014). Compensation. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Olawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. (2018). A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 231–250.

Opatha, H. H. D. N. P., & Arulrajah, A. A. (2014). Green Human Resource Management: Simplified General Reflections. International Business Research, 7(8).

Poria, Y., Reichel, A., & Brandt, Y. (2011). Dimensions of hotel experience of people with disabilities: an exploratory study. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 23(5), 571–591.

Radvila, G., & Šilingienė, V. (2018). Characteristics of remuneration systems of organizations for sustainable human resource management: Theoretical approach. CISABE'2018: 7th International Conference on Changes in Social and Business Environment, April 26-27, 2018, Panevėžys, Lithuania, 103-112.

Renwick, D. W., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2012). Green Human Resource Management: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1–14.

Sauer, S. J., Rodgers, M., & Becker, W. J. (2018). The Effects of Goals and Pay Structure on Managerial Reporting Dishonesty. Journal of Accounting, Ethics and Public Policy, 19(3). Available: (April 9, 2020).

Schmitt-Grohé, S., & Uribe, M. (2016). Downward Nominal Wage Rigidity, Currency Pegs, and Involuntary Unemployment. Journal of Political Economy, 124(5), 1466–1514.

Shani, A. B., & Docherty, P. (2003). Learning by design: building sustainable organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.

Stankevičiūtė, Ž. (2015). Tvarumo dimensija organizacijos žmonių išteklių valdyme (PhD dissertation). Kauno technologijos universitetas, Kaunas.

Sundberg, D. B. (2015). "The Effects of Incentive Pay Systems with Tiered Goals on Performance". Dissertations. 542. Available: (April 9, 2020).

Thanassoulis, J., & Tanaka, M. (2018). Optimal Pay Regulation for Too-Big-to-Fail Banks. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 33, 83-97.

Trif, A., & Geary, J. (2016). The purpose of variable pay schemes and trade unions. Employee Relations, 38(2), 182-199.

Vanagas, P. (2009). Darbo organizavimas, normavimas ir atlyginimas už darbą: vadovėlis. Kaunas: Technologija.

Wang, T., Zhao, B., & Thornhill, S. (2015). Pay dispersion and organizational innovation: The mediation effects of employee participation and voluntary turnover. Human Relations, 68(7). 1155-1181.

Wang, T., Thornhill, S., & Zhao, B. (2016). Pay-for-Performance, Employee Participation, and SME Performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(3), 412-434.

Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management. Journal of management, 18(2). 295-320.


To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the '' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.

Copyright © Macrothink Institute   ISSN 2162-3058

'Macrothink Institute' is a trademark of Macrothink Institute, Inc.