Employee Engagement and Its Relationship Towards Normative Commitment in Malaysia Oil and Gas Industry

Ridwan Mokhtar, Sylvia Nabila Azwa Ambad, Sharifah Nurafizah Syed Annuar, Nelson Lajuni

Abstract


The relationship between employee engagement and organisational commitment has been established and documented in past literature. Hitherto, they are still very relevant and remain a pertinent subject to be discussed, especially with the rapid evolution of business and adjustments in the economic setting. However, much of the focus of past studies were surrounding employee engagement divulging organisational commitment. Only a few studies on the impacts of employee engagement on normative commitment have been shown, especially in Malaysia’s oil and gas industry. We do not adequately know how employee engagement is associated with normative commitment. Hence, this study goals to examine the effects of employee engagement on normative commitment. Two hundred fifty offshore employees participated in this study. Subsequently, 234 completed responses were collected, and Partial Least Squared-Structural Equation Modelling were used to analyse the data using SmartPLS 3.3.2 version. The findings advise that employee engagement, particularly organisational engagement dimension, has a positive relationship with both normative commitment dimensions among offshore employees in Malaysia. This study provided oil and gas organisation with an improved insight and understanding of the significance of the organisational engagement aspect in improving employees’ level of normative commitment among offshore employees. Because of the recent pandemic outbreak, future studies should consider the organisational support rendered by the organisation to offshore employees in predicting the new norms for oil and gas companies. Future studies should also utilise the qualitative approach or employ the Partial Least Square-Multi-Group Analysis (PLS-MGA) to examine whether ethnicity, working tenure, and working locations play an essential role in the relationship between employee engagement and normative commitment. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Addae, H. M., Parboteeah, K. P., & Velinor, N. (2008). Role stressors and organisational commitment: Public sector employment in St Lucia. International Journal of Manpower, 29(6), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720810904220

Albdour, A. A., & Altarawneh, I. I. (2014). Employee engagement and organizational commitment: Evidence from Jordan. International Journal of Business, 19(2), 192–212. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314759577

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organisation. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x

Beardwell, J., & Thompson, A. (2014). Human resource management: A contemporary approach (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: John Wiley.

Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7–16. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220260360

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organisational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x

Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3) 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500

Etzioni, A. (1975). A comparative analysis of complex organisations. New York: Free Press.

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

Gellatly, I. R., Meyer, J. P., & Luchak, A. A. (2006). Combined effects of the three commitment components on focal and discretionary behaviours: A test of Meyer and Herscovitch’s propositions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(2), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.12.005

Hair, J. F., Jr. Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Thiele, K. O. (2017). Mirror, mirror on the wall: A comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modelling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45, 616-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x

Hakanen, J. J., Schaufeli, W. B., & Ahola, K. (2008). The job demands-resources model: A three-year cross-lagged study of burnout, depression, commitment, and work engagement. Work and Stress, 22(3), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370802379432

Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268

Hayduk, L. A., & Littvay, L. (2012). Should researchers use single indicators, best indicators, or multiple indicators in structural equation models? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 159. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-159

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Jaros, S. (2015). Meyer and Allen model of organisational commitment: Measurement issues. Icfai Journal of Organizational Behavior, 6(4), 7–25. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/35387821

Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287

Kanter, R. M. (1968). Commitment and social organisation: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American Sociological Review, 33(4), 499−517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092438

Khodakarami, N., & Dirani, K. (2020). Drivers of employee engagement: differences by work area and gender. Industrial and Commercial Training, 52(1), 81−91. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-06-2019-0060

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Lohmöller, J.-B. (1989). Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Verlag: Physica-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52512-4

May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892

Meyer, J. P., & Parfyonova, N. M. (2010). Normative commitment in the workplace: A theoretical analysis and re-conceptualization. Human Resource Management Review, 20(4), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.09.001

Newstrom, J. W. (2015). Organisation behavior: Human behavior at work (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.

Ringle, C., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH.

Roldán, J. L., & Sánchez-Franco, M. J. (2012). Variance-based structural equation modeling: Guidelines for using partial least squares. In M. Mora, O. Gelman, A. L. Steenkamp, & M. Raisinghani (Eds.), Research methodologies, innovations and philosophies in software systems engineering and information systems (pp. 193-221). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0179-6.ch010

Roussenau, D. M. (1995). Promises in action: Psychological contracts in organisations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Rothbard, N. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 655–684. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094827

Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169

San Martín, S. (2008). Relational and economic antecedents of organisational commitment. Personnel Review, 37(6), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480810906856

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Roma, V. A., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326

Scholl, R. W. (1981). Differentiating organisational commitment from expectancy as a motivating force. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1981.4285698

Sonnentag, S. (2011). Research on work engagement is well and alive. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.510639

Wachira, J. M. (2013). Relationship between employee engagement and commitment in Barclays bank of Kenya (Master’s thesis, University of Nairobi). Retrieved from http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/58865

Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organisations: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7, 418–428. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1982.4285349

Wiener, Y., & Gechman, A. S. (1977). Commitment: A behavioral approach to job involvement. Journal of Vocational Behavior 10(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(77)90041-0




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v11i1.18260

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.

Copyright © Macrothink Institute   ISSN 2162-3058

'Macrothink Institute' is a trademark of Macrothink Institute, Inc.