Rational Choice, Personal Norms, Social Norms and Intention to Commit Resume Fraud

Fion L. C. Man, Holly H. He, Siu Kau Cheung

Abstract


Referring to rational choice theory, theory of planned behavior, situational action theory, and model of frame selection, the study examines the effects of rational choice variables, social (subjective) norms, and personal (moral) norms on a sample of 286 associate degree graduants’ intention to misrepresent information on their resumes with a view to identifying ways to curb the problem. Participants were asked to indicate their likelihood of fabricating, embellishing, and omitting information on their resumes in response to a hypothetical recruitment advertisement. Their perceived benefits/costs of resume fraud as well as the respective probabilities of occurrence, perceived social norms and personal norms were measured. Results found that only perceived benefits (but not perceived costs or the probabilities of occurrence) and personal norms (but not social norms) had direct effects on intention to commit resume fraud. The findings suggest that while job applicants are utilitarian, their rationality is bounded, and they only use limited information in making relevant decisions. Personal norms also moderated the effect of perceived benefits on resume fraud, with effect of perceived benefits much weakened among those with higher personal norms. The results cast doubt on the use of deterrence measures to curb resume fraud. On the other hand, the importance of business ethics education is highlighted.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behaviors. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-40). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1969). The prediction of behavioral intentions in a choice situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5(4), 400-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(69)90033-X

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1970). The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6(4), 466-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(70)90057-0

Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bachman, R., Paternoster, R., & Ward, S. (1992). The rationality of sexual offending: Testing a deterrence/rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law and Society Review, 26, 343-372. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053901

Beccaria, C. (1963, Original work published 1764). On crimes and punishments (introduction by H. Paolucci, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.

Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: an economic approach. The Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1830482

Bible, J. D. (2012). Lies and damned lies: Some legal implications of resume fraud and advice for preventing it. Employee Relations Law Journal, 38, 22–47.

Biel, A. & Thoegersen, J. (2007). Activation of social norms in social dilemma: A review of the evidence and reflections on the implications for environmental behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(1), 96-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.03.003

Black, J. S., Stern, P. C., & Elworth, J. T. (1985). Personal and contextual influences on household energy adaptations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.1.3

Botetzagias, I., Dima, A-F., & Malesios, C. (2015). Extending the theory of planned behavior in the context of recycling: The role of moral norms and of demographic predictors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 95, 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.004

Clarke, R. V. (2014). Affect and the reasoning criminal: past and future. In J. L. Van Gelder, H. Elffers, D. Reynald & D. Nagin (Eds.), Affect and cognition in criminal decision-making (pp. 20-41). London, England: Routledge.

Clarke, R. & Cornish, D. B. (1985). Modelling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. In T. Michael & N. Morris (Eds.) Crime and justice. An annual review of research, vol. 6 (pp. 147–85). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Clarke, R. V. (1992). Introduction. In R.V. Clarke (Ed.) Situational crime prevention. Successful case studies (pp. 3–36). New York: Harrow & Heston.

Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (1987). Understanding crime displacement: An application of rational choice theory. Criminology, 25(4), 933-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1987.tb00826.x

Cromwell, P., Parker, L., & Mobley, S. (2003). The five-finger discount: An analysis of motivations for shoplifting. In P. Cromwell (Ed.), In their own words: Criminals on crime (pp. 113-125). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing.

Curtis, G. J., Cowcher, E., Greene, B. R., Rundle, K., Paull, M., & Davis, M. C. (2018). Self-control, injunctive norms, and descriptive norms predict engagement in plagiarism in a Theory of Planned Behavior Model. Journal of Academic Ethics, 16(3), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-018-9309-2

Dahlbäck, O. (2003). Analyzing rational crime – models and methods. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7

De Haan, W., & Vos, J. (2003). A crying shame: The over-rationalized conception of man in the rational choice perspective. Theoretical Criminology, 7(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480603007001199

Dhami, M. K., & Mandel, D. R. (2012). Crime as risk taking. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(4), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2010.498423

Donovan, J. J., Dwight, S. A., & Hurtz, G. M. (2003). An assessment of the prevalence, severity, and verifiability of entry-level applicant faking using the randomized response technique. Human Performance, 16(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1601_4

Doran, R., & Larsen, S. (2016). The relative importance of social and personal norms in explaining intentions to choose eco-friendly travel options. International Journal of Tourism Research, 18(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2042

Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension: Towards a new economics. New York: The Free Press.

Foglia, W. D. (1997). Perceptual deterrence and the mediating effect of internalized norms among inner-city teenagers. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(4), 414-442.

Fontaine, R. G., Fida, R., Paciello, M., Tisak, M. S., & Caprara, G. V. (2012). The mediating role of moral disengagement in the developmental course from peer rejection in adolescence to crime in early adulthood. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2012.719622

Fornara, F., Carrus, G., Passafaro, P., & Bonnes, M. (2011). Distinguishing the sources of normative influence on pro-environmental behaviors: The role of local norms in household waste recycling. Group Process and Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 623-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211408149

Gudjonsson, G. H. (2016). Hans Eysenck's theory on the ‘causes’ and ‘cures’ of criminality: A personal reflection. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.030

Haar, D-H., & Wikström, P-O, H. (2010). Crime propensity, criminogenic exposure and violent scenario responses: Testing situational action theory in regression and Rasch models. European Journal of Applied Mathematics, 21(4-5), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956792510000161

Henle, C. A., Dineen, B. R. & Duffy, M. K. (2019). Assessing intentional resume deception: Development and nomological network of a resume fraud measure. Journal of Business Psychology, 34, 87-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9527-4

Higgins, G. E. (2007). Digital piracy, self-control theory, and rational choice: an examination of the role of value. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 1(1), 33-55. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.18277

HireRight. (2017). 2017 Employment screening benchmark report. Retrieved from https://www.hireright.com/benchmarking

HireRight. (2019). Resume discrepancies in decline as APAC businesses up their efforts to screen candidates. Retrieved from https://www.hireright.com/apac/news/press-release/apac-2017-2018-candidate-discrepancy-spotlight

Hopper, J. R., & Nielsen, J. M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behavior. Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program. Environment and Behavior, 23(2), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591232004

Kahneman, D. & Frederick, S. (2004). Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In M. Augier & J. G. March (Eds.), Models of a man: Essays in memory of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 411–432). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kim, B. H. (2011). Deception and applicant faking: Putting the pieces together. In G. P. Hodgkinson & J. I. Ford (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 26, (pp. 239-292). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.

Kroneberg, C., Heintze, I., & Mehlkop, G. (2010). The interplay of moral norms and instrumental incentives in crime causation. Criminology 48(1), 259-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00187.x

Liao, C., Lin, H-N., & Liu, Y-P (2010). Predicting the use of pirated software: A contingency model integrating perceived risk with the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0081-5

Matsueda, R. L., Kreager, D. A., & Huizinga, D. (2006). Deterring delinquents: A rational choice model of theft and violence. American Sociological Review, 71(1), 95-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100105

McDaniel, M. A., Douglas, E. F., & Snell, A. F. (1997). A survey of deception among job seekers. In G. J. Lautenschlager (Chair), Faking on non-cognitive measures: The extent, impact, and identification of assimilation. Symposium conducted at the 12th annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. St. Louis, MO.

Mehlkop, G., & Graeff, P. (2010). Modelling a rational choice theory of criminal action: Subjective expected utilities, norms, and interactions. Rationality and Society, 22(2), 189-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463110364730

Norman, P. (2011). The theory of planned behavior and binge drinking among undergraduate students: Assessing the impact of habit strength. Addictive behaviors, 36(5), 502-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.01.025

Parsons, J. T., Halkitis, P. N., Bimbi, D., & Borkowski, T. (2000) Perceptions of the benefits and costs associated with condom use and unprotected sex among late adolescent college students. Journal of adolescence, 23(4), 377-391. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2000.0326

Parsons, J. T., Siegel, A. W., & Cousins, J. H. (1997). Late adolescent risk-taking: Effects of perceived benefits and perceived risks on behavioral intentions and behavioral change. Journal of Adolescence, 20(4), 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1997.0094

Paternoster, R., & Simpson, S. (1996). Sanction threats and appeals to morality: testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law & Society Review, 30(3), 549–584. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054128

Pogarsky, G., Piquero, A.R., & Paternoster, R. (2004). Modeling change in perceptions about sanction threats: the neglected linkage in deterrence theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20(4), 343-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-004-5868-z

Prospects. (2017). Advice and guidance on degree fraud: A toolkit for employers. Manchester, UK: Higher Education Careers Services Unit (HECSU).

Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology Vol. 10, (pp. 22 1-279). New York: Academic Press.

Shah, A. K., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.207

Shover, N., & Hochstetler, A. (2005). Choosing white-collar crime. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Skrzypiec, G. (2017) Adolescents’ intentions to engage in criminal activity: A cross-disciplinary approach linking theories from social psychology and criminology. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 17(5), 305-337, https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2017.1374720

Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2009). Using the theory of planned behavior and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct. Career Development International, 14(3), 221-241. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430910966415

Synyak, K. (2014). Exploring relationships between resume fraud and individual differences. Unpublished master’s dissertation, The University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Tibbetts, S. G., & Myers, D. L. (1999). Low self-control, rational choice, and student test cheating. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23(2), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887271

Tittle, C. R., Antonaccio, O., Botchkovar, E., & Kranidioti, M. (2010). Expected utility, self-control, morality, and criminal probability. Social Science Research, 39(6) 1029-1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.007

Van Gelder, J. L. (2013). Beyond rational choice: the hot/cool perspective of criminal decision making. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(9), 745-763. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2012.660153

Walters, G. D. (2015). The decision to commit crime: Rational or nonrational? Criminology, Criminal Justice Law, and Society, 16(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.21202/1993-047X.10.2016.3.252-270

Wenzel, M. (2004). The Social side of sanctions: personal and social norms as moderators of deterrence. Law and Hum Behavior, 28(5), 547–567. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000046433.57588.71

White, K. M., Smith, J. R., Terry, D. J., Greenslade, J. H., & McKimmie, B. M. (2009). Social influence in the theory of planned behavior: the role of descriptive, injunctive and in-group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), 135-158. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X295207

Wikström, P. O. (2004). Crime as alternative. Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. In J. McCord (Ed.). Beyond empiricism: institutions and intentions in the study of crime. Advances in criminological theory (pp. 1-37). New Brunswick, NY: Transaction.

Wood, J. L., Schmidtke, J. M. & Decker, D. L. (2007). Lying on job applications: The effects of job relevance, commission, and human resource management experience. Journal of Business Psychology, 22(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-007-9048-7

Wright, V. (2010). Deterrence in criminal justice: evaluating certainty vs. severity of punishment. DC: The Sentencing Project.

Yoon, C. (2010). Theory of planned behavior and ethics theory in digital piracy: An integrated model. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0687-7

Zinatmotlagh, F., Ataee, M., Jalilian, F., Mirzaeialavijeh, M., Aghaei, A., & Shirazi, K. K. (2013). Predicting aggression among male adolescents: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Health Promotion Perspectives, 3(2), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.5681/hpp.2013.031




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijssr.v9i1.17812

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




International Journal of Social Science Research (Online ISSN: 2327-5510) E-mail: ijssr@macrothink.org

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.

Copyright © Macrothink Institute   ISSN 2327-5510