The Manifestation of Internal Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee’s Behaviour in Small Medium Sized Enterprises

Mei Peng Low, Seng Fook Ong

Abstract


Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has gained increasing attention and popularity since the last decade. There are many CSR debates arise since then. These debates were shaped by trends and fundamental changes of the political, social, and economic spheres of life. Tracing back, the precursor to CSR was topic of charitable giving, which had been in existence since 1980s. Todate, CSR has evolved to a business concept that had been accepted widely. Business corporations are focusing on CSR due to tremendous pressures from the society. Presently, CSR approach has emerged from focusing on the shareholders to stakeholders due to the acknowledgement of the crucial roles of stakeholders in every organisation. Stakeholder management and CSR is a relational affair. Stakeholder theory involves list of critical stakeholders namely employees, suppliers, customers, media, local communities, NGOs, that could be source of new competitive advantage. This present a research agenda to look into internal CSR practices as to how it manifest among the crucial stakeholders of every organisation, i.e. the employees, on their attitudes and behaviours. As Small Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) are gaining its foothold in Malaysia, they also encountered many challenges, one of these is the issue of high employee turnover that lead to substantial costs to the organisations. The findings reveal that internal CSR practices enhanced employee’s job satisfaction and also resulted in the reduction of employee’s turnover intention. It was interesting to discover that internal CSR practices enhance employee’s organisational commitment like job satisfaction, but it failed to reduce employee’s turnover intention through enhanced organisation commitment as a result of internal CSR practices. The results also show that perceived ease of movement has an impact on employee’s turnover intention.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2013). What corporate environmental sustainability can do for industrial-organizational psychology. In A. H. Huffman & S. R. Kelin (Eds.), Green organizations: Driving change with I-O psychology (pp. 379-392). New York: Routlege. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iops.12059

Aguilera, R., Ruth, V., Rupp, D., Williams, C., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A multi-level theory of social change in organizations. Academy of management Review, 32, 836-863. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275678

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1998) Structural equation modeling in practice; A review and recommended two-step approach. Psycho Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990).The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x

Ali, I., Rehman, K. U., Ali, S.I., Yousof, J., & Zia, M. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility Influences, employee commitment and organizational performance. African Journal of Business Management, 4(12), 2796-2801.

Al-bdour, A. A., Nasruddin, E., & Lin, S. K. (2010). The relationship between internal corporate social responsibility and organizational commitment within the banking sector in Jordan. International Journal of Human Social Sciences, 14(6), 932-951.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organization commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701-1719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190701570866

Byrne, D. (2002). Interpreting Quantitative Data. London: Sage.

Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS, Q22(1), 7-16.

Chin, W. W. (2000) Partial least squares for researchers: An overview and presentation of recent advances using PLS approach.

Chin, W. W., Gopal, A., & Salisbury, W. D. (1997). Advancing the theory of adoptive structuration: the development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Infor Sys Res, 8(4), 342-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.4.342

Charkham, J. (1994). Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries, Claredon, Oxford.

Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2010). A theoretical model of intentional social action in online social network. Decision Support Syst, 49(1), 24-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.12.006

Clarkson, M. B. E. (1994). A Risk Based Model of Stakeholder Theory. Proceedings of the Second Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory, Centre for Corporate Social Performance & Ethics University of Toronto, Toronto.

Clarke, T. (2007). International Corporate Governance: A Comparative Approach, New York: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203300725

Coyle-Shapiro, J., & Shore, L. (2007). The employee–organization relationship: Where do we go from here? Human Resource Management Review, 17(2), 166-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.03.008

Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Prentice Hall.

Fichtner, F., Baldi, G., Bremus, F., Brenke, K., Dreger, C., Engerer, H., & Zaklan, A. (2015). Upswing in a subdued global economy: DIW economic outlook. DIW Economic Bulletin, 5(11), 151-157.

Freeman, R. E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of management review, 24(2), 233-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1999.1893933

Fronell, C., & Lacker, D. F. (1981) Evaluation structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. J. Mark Res, 18(10), 39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Fuentes-García, F, J., Núñez-Tabales, J, M., &Veroz-Herradón, R. (2008). Applicability of corporate social responsibility to human resources management: Perspective from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 27-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9560-8

Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2092623

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C. , Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Hulin, C. L, Roznowski, M., & Hachiya, D. (1985). Alternative opportunities and withdrawal decisions: Empirical and theoretical discrepancies and an integration, Psychological Bulletin, 97, 233-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.233

Inyang, B. J., Awa, H. O., & Enuoh, R. O. (2011). CSR-HRM nexus: Defining the role engagement of the human resources professional. International Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(5), 118-126.

Kiyak, A., Namazi, K., & Kahana, E. (1997). Job commitment and turnover among women working in facilities serving older persons. Research on Aging, 19, 223-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0164027597192004

Kucukusta, D., Mak, A., & Chan, X. (2013). Corporate social responsibility practices in four and five-star hotels: Perspectives from Hong Kong visitors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34(0), 19-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.01.010

Lepoutre, J., & Heena, A. (2006). Investigating the impact of firm size on small business social responsibility: A critical review. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 257-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9183-5

Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 1, 1297-1343.

Lockett, A., Moon, J., & Visser, W. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in management research: Focus, nature, salience and sources of influence. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 115-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00585.x

Lozano, J. M., & Prandi, M. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and human rights in Mullerat, Ramon (Ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility, The Corporate Governance of the 21st century (pp. 183-204).The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 237-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.2.237

Mor Barak, M., Nissly, J., & Levin, A. (2001). Antecedents to retention and turnover among child welfare, social work, and other human service employees: What can we learn from past research? A review and met analysis. Social Service Review, 75, 625-661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/323166

Morrow, P. C. (2010). Managing organizational commitment: Insights from longitudinal research. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 79(1), 18-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.12.008

Muchinsky, P. M., & Morrow, P. C. (1980). A multidisciplinary model of voluntary employee turnover. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 17, 263-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(80)90022-6

O'Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of applied psychology, 71(3), 492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.492

Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.

Price, J. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

Price, J., & C. Mueller (1986). Absenteeism and turnover among hospital employees. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Rahim, A. R., Jalaludin, F. W., & Tajuddin, K. (2011). The importance of CSR on consumer behaviour in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 16(1), 119-139.

Rupp, D., Gananpathy, J., Aguilera, R., & Williams, C. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 537-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.380

Sang, S., Lee, L. D., & Lee, J. (2010). E-government: people, process, and policy (pp. 138-157). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17506161011047370

Thauer, C. R. (2013). Goodness Comes From Within: Intra-Organizational Dynamics of Corporate Social Responsibility. Business & Society, 0007650313475770.

Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 411-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9780-6

Werther, W. B., & Chandler, D. (2006). Responsibility: Stakeholders in a Global Environment (Sage Publications, USA).

Wheeler, D., & Sillanpaa, M. (1997). The Stakeholder Corporation: A Blueprint for Maximizing Stakeholder Value (Pitman, London).

Whitener, E. M. (2001). ‘Do ‘‘high-commitment’’ human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modelling’. Journal of Management, 27(5), 515-535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700502

Williams, L. J., & Hazer, J. T. (1986). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods. Journal of applied psychology, 71(2), 219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.219

Verdeyen, V., Put, J., & van Buggenhout, B. (2004). A social stakeholder model. International Journal of Social Welfare, 13(4), 325-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2004.00328.x

Vives, A. (2006). Social and environmental responsibility in small and medium enterprises in Latin America. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, 39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2006.sp.00006




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jsss.v2i2.7659

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal of Social Science Studies ISSN 2329-9150

Copyright © Macrothink Institute

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.