Implications of Academic Staff Participation in Teaching Practice on the Quality of Bachelor of Education Program in Selected Public Universities in Kenya

Anthony Njoroge Johnson, Gathara Peter, Kirimi Francis


One of the major determinants of quality education in the Bachelor of Education program is the Teaching Practice component. Globally teaching practice is a mandatory undertaking, at both universities and tertiary teacher training colleges. Various universities adopt different modes of teaching practice especially with regards to its supervision. The exercise of teaching practice supervision is often faced by a number of challenges, for example, inadequate staffing which means that teacher trainees may not be adequately supervised. As such, this study aimed at establishing the implications of academic staff participation in teaching practice on the quality of B.Ed program. Hence, this study sought to answer the research question: how does academic staff participation in teaching practice influence the quality of Bachelor of Education program in public universities in Kenya? The study employed a descriptive survey research design. The scope of the study was the University of Nairobi and Kenyatta University. The target population of the study comprised 12,342 respondents, where 30 percent of them (433) were sampled. Moi University was used for piloting, after which instruments were modified to ensure highest validity and reliability. The research instruments used in the study comprised questionnaires, interview guide and document analysis schedule. Data collected was analyzed using SPSS. The study findings were presented by the use of frequency tables. The study established that, other than the normal teaching load, academic staff were also tasked with the duty of supervising students while in teaching practice. The study established that on average each lecturer was to supervise at least 20-25 supervision over a two weeks period. In fact, some supervisors devised their own mechanisms of handling a large number of students in teaching practice, for instance, some of them would assemble students in a common hall, mostly away from their stations of practice. Such mechanisms can only be inappropriate as far as quality of assessment is concerned. The challenges surrounding participation of Bachelor of Education academic staff in teaching practice, such as a large number of students, remoteness of some stations as well as inadequate facilitation of academic staff makes it difficult for them to ensure quality experience is gained by students in teaching practice, and as such, this study concludes that teaching practice has not modeled B.Ed. students as expected by CUE. The study recommends Commission for University Education to come up with standard guidelines, which defines the kind of teaching practice Bachelor of Education students should be subjected into, the qualification of academic staff expected to conduct the preparation and assessment as well as the nature of the schools where students can undertake the teaching practice. In so doing, they will compel all the universities offering the degree to ensure quality standards are adhered to at all times. The study further recommends the university management to incorporate the model of mentor supervisors and regulate their recruitment, incentives and reporting in order to reduce the burden of B.Ed Academic Staff participation in teaching practice.

Full Text:



American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (2010). The clinical preparation of teachers: A policy brief. Washington, D.C.: AACTE.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (Eds.). (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term. Routledge.

Busher, H. (2005). The project of the other: Developing inclusive learning communities in schools. Oxford Review of Education, 31(4), 459-477.

Caires, S., & Almeida, L. S. (2005). Teaching practice in Initial Teacher Education: Its impact on student teachers’ professional skills and development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 31(2), 111-120.

Dooner, A. M., Mandzuk, D., & Clifton, R. A. (2008). Stages of collaboration and the realities of professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 564-574.

Hascher, T., Cocard, Y., & Moser, P. (2004). Forget about theory practice is all? Student teachers’ learning in practicum. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10(6), 623-637.

Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 372-400.

Kiggundu, E., & Nayimuli, S. (2009. Teaching practice: A make or break phase for student teachers. South African Journal of Education, 29, 345-358.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.

Mills, J. (2007). Instrumental Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, G. A. (2003). Research Methods Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi: ACTS.

Ngidi, D. P., & Sibaya, P. T. (2003). Student teacher anxieties related to practice teaching. South African Journal of Education, 23(1), 18-22.

Plaisir, J. Y., Hachey, A. C., & Theilheimer, R. (2011). Their portfolios, our role: Examining a community college teacher education digital portfolio program from the students’ perspective. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 32(2), 159-175.

Rickards, W. H., & Guilbault, L. (2009). Studying student reflection in an electronic portfolio environment. Electronic Portfolios, 2, 17-28.

Sales, A., Traver, J. A., & García, R. (2011). Action research as a school-based strategy in intercultural professional development for teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 911-919.

Smith, A. (2010). The theory of moral sentiments. London: Oxford University Press.

Smith, K., & Lev-Ari, L. (2005). The place of the practicum in pre-service teacher education: The voice of the students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 289-302.

Strijbos, J., Meeus, W., & Libotton, A. (2007). Portfolio assignments in teacher education: A tool for self-regulating the learning process? International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 17.

Zambo, D., & Zambo, R. (2007). Action research in an undergraduate teacher education program: What promises does it hold? Action in Teacher Education, 28(4), 62-74.

Zwart, R. C., Wubbels, T., Bergen, T. C. M., & Bolhuis, S. (2007). Experienced teacher learning within the context of reciprocal peer coaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 13(2), 165-187.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Anthony Njoroge Johnson, Gathara Peter, Kirimi Francis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of Education and Training      ISSN 2330-9709

Copyright © Macrothink Institute

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the '' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.

If you have any questions, please contact