A Further Examination of the Relationship between Contract Administration Problems and Contract Type

Bill Davison, Richard J Sebastian, Tina M Borger


This new research supports the 2006 research conducted by Davison and Sebastian (Davison-Sebastian 2007) that data is available for, each type of contract, the likelihood of contract administration problems occurring and the consequences of these problems if they do occur. With this data the procurement professional can utilize a traditional risk management process to determine an overall risk factor for each problem and then develop proactive risk mitigation plans that are based on eliminating or reducing each of the previously identified risks, or problems that have been identified. The major findings were that the 2011 results were comparable to 2006 in that when contract administration problems occurred, problematic consequences were more likely than no consequences for all contract types except leases and that the types of problematic consequences that were most likely depended on the type of contract. The implications of the research results for procurement professionals and the limitations of the research will be discussed.

Full Text:


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v5i1.2497

Copyright (c)

Journal of Management Research ISSN 1941-899X

Email: jmr@macrothink.org

Copyright © Macrothink Institute


To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.