Attempts of Fully Controlling Bureaucracy: Quae Merito?

Jochelle Greaves Siew

Abstract


The performance of government bureaucrats profoundly impacts the daily lives of citizens, with their unseen decisions affecting, inter alia, the safety of society, public education standards, and working conditions. Still, scholars dispute the power of bureaucrats, and whether and how it should be controlled. Some contend that bureaucratic activity must be firmly controlled since bureaucrats are expected to shirk their responsibilities. Contrarily, others postulate that a trust-based system would be better-suited as bureaucrats subscribe to values related to public interest, professional norms, and organisational loyalty. This article conducts a review of relevant literature on ‘top-down’ and ‘trust-based’ control mechanisms in order to recommend suitable approaches for controlling bureaucratic activity, considering the factors which affect the nature of their work. It is shown that a trust-based model is appropriate as it results in an equilibrium being achieved, with discretion utilised as a tool for implementation, whilst bureaucratic activity is monitored and controlled in a less intrusive and demotivating manner. While command-and-control methods produce better results in cases where short-term cost control and productivity are in question, this approach is unsustainable in the long-run due to inherently faulty assumptions about bureaucratic motivation. This article also recognises that multiple mechanisms of control might be necessary, depending on what is appropriate according to political judgements on contexts and organisational goals. Bureaucrats are accountable in different ways, at several levels and to varying degrees, so the mechanisms used to monitor and control them should reflect this reality.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Brehm, J., & Gates, S. (1997). Working, shirking, and sabotage: Bureaucratic response to a democratic public. Univ. of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.15149

Dan Wood, B., & Waterman, R. W. (1991). The Dynamics of Political Control of The Bureaucracy. The American Political Science Review, 8(3), 801-828. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963851

Davis, J. H., Schoorman, D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20-47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258

Elmore, R. F. (1979). Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions. Political Science Quarterly, 94(4), 601-616. https://doi.org/10.2307/2149628

Feldman, M. S., & Khademian, A. M. (2007). The Role of the Public Manager in Inclusion: Creating Communities of Participation. Governance, 20(2), 305-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00358.x

Gilson, L. L. (2015). ‘Michael Lipsky, Street Level Bureaucracy’: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. In M Lodge et al (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Public Policy and Administration. OUP.

Gofen, A. (2013). Mind the Gap: Dimensions and Influence of Street-Level Divergence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 473-493. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut037

Hill, M., & Hupe, P. L. (2009). Implementing Public Policy: An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance (2nd edn.). Sage.

Huber, J. D., & Shipan, C. R. (2002). Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. CUP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804915

Hupe, P. L., & Hill, M. (2007). Street Level Bureaucracy and Public Accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x

Kaufman, H. (1981). Fear of Bureaucracy: A Raging Epidemic. Public Administration Review, 4(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.2307/975718

Le Grand, J. (2003). Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens. OUP. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199266999.001.0001

Lipsky, M. (1969a, September 2-6). Toward a Theory of Street-Level Bureaucracy. [Paper presentation]. American Political Science Association, New York, NY. https://www.canonsociaalwerk.eu/1969_lipsky/1969_Lipsky_Toward%20a%20theory%20of%20street%20level%20bureaucracy.pdf

Lipsky, M. (1971b). Street-Level Bureaucracy and the Analysis of Urban Reform. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 6(4), 391-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/107808747100600401

Lipsky, M. (1980c). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage. https://doi.org/10.2307/1288305

May, P. J., & Winter, S. C. (2009). Politicians, Managers, and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Influences on Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 453-476. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum030

McCubbins, M., & Schwartz, S. (1984). Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28(1), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110792

Moe, T. M. (1984). The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 737-777. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110997

Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Harvard University Press

Niskanen, W. (1971). Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Aldine-Atherton.

Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2017). The shirking bureaucrat: a theory in search of evidence?. Policy & Politics, 45(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317X14845830916703

Tummers, L., & Bekkers, B. (2014). Policy Implementation, Street-level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841978




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v11i1.18008

Copyright (c) 2021 Jochelle Greaves Siew

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Journal of Public Administration and Governance  ISSN 2161-7104

Email: jpag@macrothink.org

Copyright © Macrothink Institute

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.