Learning Effects, Achievement Goals and Time Constraints in Accounting Education: Findings from Experiments

Pi-Yueh Cheng, Miao-Ling Fang

Abstract


Accounting education has been a topic of great concern to scholars, and teachers of accounting want to enhance students’ learning performance. Thus, in this study, we conducted laboratory experiments to investigate how mastery/performance achievement goal orientations influence the accounting performance of students. Ninety undergraduates from Tainan Technology University participated in this study. The experiment examined how the type of student achievement goal and the test time influenced accounting performance. A two-way between-participants factorial design of achievement goal (mastery vs. performance) × test time (30 vs. 40 vs. 50 min) was adopted. The results of students’ score changes from pre-test to post-test revealed that those students with a mastery achievement goal had a better learning effect than those with a performance achievement goal. The main effect of test time also showed a significant difference. The score change in the low-difficulty condition (longest time) was significantly higher than that in the moderate-difficulty condition (intermediate amount of time), and the score change in the moderate-difficulty condition was significantly higher than that in the high-difficulty condition (shortest time). Lastly, the two-way interaction of achievement goal type and test time was significant. The effect of test difficulty on score change was contingent on the type of achievement goal.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1816–1828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261

Belenky, D. M., & Nokes-Malach, D. J. (2012). Motivation and transfer: The role of mastery-approach goals in preparation for future learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 399-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.651232

Belenky, D. M., & Nokes-Malach, D. J. (2013). Mastery-approach goals and knowledge transfer: An investigation into the effects of task structure and framing instructions. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 21-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.02.004

Benson, L. III, & Beach, O. (1996). The effects of time constraints on the pre-choice screening of decision options. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 222-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0075

Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. (2003). Academic motivation in self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychological Review, 15, 1-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2016.07.013

Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1167267

Brophy, J. (2005). Goal theorists should be move on from performance goals. Educational Psychologists, 40, 167-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4003_3

Butler, R. (2005). Competence assessment, competence, and motivation between early and middle childhood. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 202–221). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Cao, R., & Liu, P. (2011). A research on how goal-setting affects the score of working memory. Journal of Psychological Science, 34, 332-336.

Chen, B. H., Hsu, M. S., & Chen, M. H. (2013). The relationship between learning attitude and anxiety in accounting classes: The case of hospitality management university students in Taiwan. Quality & Quantity, 47, 2815-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9691-6

Cheng, M. M., Schultz, A. K. D., & Booth, P. (2009). Knowledge transfer in project reviews: The effect of self-justification bias and moral hazard. Accounting & Finance, 49, 75-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2008.00271.x

Chiou, W. B., & Wan, C. S. (2007). The dynamic change of self-efficacy in information searching on the Internet: Influence of valence of experience and prior self-efficacy. The Journal of Psychology, 141, 598-603. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.141.6.589-604

Chuderski, A. (2016). Time pressure prevents relational learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 361-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.006

Colburn, A. (2000). Inquiring scientists want to know. Educational Leadership, 62(1), 63–66.

Darnon, C., Dompnier, B., Gilliéron, O., & Butera, F. (2010). The interplay of mastery and performance goals in social comparison: A multiple-goal perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 212-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018161

Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2004). Causes and constraints of shift-to-easier-materials effects in the control study. Memory and Cognition, 32, 779-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195868

Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3

Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501

Gore, P. (2006). Academic self-efficacy as a predictor of college outcomes: Two incremental validity studies. Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 92-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1069072705281367

Hall, T. W., Pierce, B. J., Tunnell, P. L., &Walther, L. M. (2014). Heterogeneous student perceptions of accounting course importance and their implications for SET reporting and use. Journal of Accounting Education, 32, 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2014.01.001

Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnernbrick-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 105-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105

Harackiewicz, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1993). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 904-915.

Harackiewicz, J. M., & Hulleman, C. S. (2010). The importance of interest: The role of achievement goals and task values in promoting the development of interest. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 42-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00207.x

Henderson, M. D., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2007). Implementation intentions and disengagement from a failing courses of action. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20, 81-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.553

Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141–184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5

Kirk, R. E. (2012). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lobato, J. (2006). Alternative perspectives on the transfer of learning: History issues, challenges for future research. The Journal of the Learning Science, 15, 431-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1504_1

Madjar, N., Kaplan, A., & Weinstock, M. (2011). Clarifying mastery-avoidance goals in high school: Distinguishing between intrapersonal and task-based standards of competence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 268-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.03.003

Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709906X118036

Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L. & Freeman. K. E. et al. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

Ordóñez, L., & Benson, L. III (1997). Decisions under pressure: How time constraint affects risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 121-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1997.2717

Preenen, P. T. Y., van Vianen, A. E. M., & De Pater, I. E. (2014). Challenging assignments and activation mood: The influence of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 650-659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12256

Pintrich, P. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1017

Roussel, P., Elliot, A. J., Feltman, R. (2011). The influence of achievement goals and social goals on help-seeking from peers in an academic context. Learning and Instruction, 21, 394-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.003

Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033

Senko, C., & Hulleman, C. S. (2013). The role of goal attainment expectancies in achievement goal pursuit. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 504-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031136

Zhang, P., Wang, Z., & Adesope, O. (2016). The effects of goal type, learning interest, and task difficulty on learning English words. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15, 32-46.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ire.v6i2.12868

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 Contact: ire@macrothink.org

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.

Copyright © Macrothink Institute   ISSN 2327-5499