Enjoyment of eLearning Among Teacher Education Students in Australia

Jennifer Rowley, Jennifer O’Dea


The major research question for this study was –“How do students perceive the enhancement of their own learning through use of eLearning?” The study investigated student teacher’s enjoyment and perceptions of eLearning and how it is enhanced by their use of various eLearning activities – particularly the discussion board. Participants were undergraduate teacher education students who were undertaking a course at the University of Sydney, Australia. Methods included a qualitative examination using focus groups, open-ended written answers and a thematic content analysis of focus group transcripts to investigate how students perceived their learning to be enhanced. Twelve major themes identified how eLearning enhanced perceived student learning. The results revealed that eLearning was found to: facilitate broader and deeper learning; provide a resource management and organisation system; allow 24 hour access and flexibility; facilitate interaction and communication with peers; enable students to work and learn at their own pace; provide a place for students to find advice, tips and assistance; and provide a site for anonymous study-related and social interaction. Positive comments related to the stimulation of thought, discussion, debate and interaction via online discussion boards. Students identified learning from other students’ differing opinions, being enabled to more deeply contextualize and further analyse helped them to develop an understanding of the content material being covered.

Full Text:



Akanbi, L. B. (2000). Enhancing Professional Experience through WebCT: a Model for preparing reading professionals. 21st National Council of States. Miami, FL, November 2000.

Bass, R. (2009). New Media Technologies and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Academic Commons. Retrieved January 7, 2009, from http://www.academiccommons.org/issue/january-2009

Bickford, D. J., & Wright, D. J. (2006). Community: The Hidden Context for Learning in Learning Spaces (an Educause e-Book, Diana Oblinger, Ed.).

Bowles, M. C. (2004). Relearning to e-learn (electronic resource): strategies for electronic learning and knowledge. Carlton, Vic.: Melbourne University Press. http/search.informit.com.au.ezproxy1.library.usyd.edu.au

Dixon, R., Dixon, K., & Siragusa, L. (2007). Individuals’ perceptions of online environments: What adult learners are telling us. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/dixon.pdf

Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., O’Hara, A., & Prosser, M. (2007). The University Student Experience of face-to-face and online discussions: coherence, reflection and meaning. ALT-J, 15(1), 83-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09687760601130057

Ferfolja, T. (2008). Building Teacher Capital in Pre-Service Teachers: Reflections on a New Teacher Education Initiative. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), 68-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2008v33n2.5

Graff, M. (2006). The Importance of online community in student academic performance. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 4(2), 127-132.

Groundwater-Smith, S., Ewing, R., & Le Cornu, R. (2011). Teaching Challenges and Dilemmas (4th Ed.). Southbank, Vic: Thomson.

Heirdsfield, A., Walker, S., Tambyah, M., & Beutel, D. (2011). Blackboard As An Online Learning Environment: What Do Teacher Education Students And Staff Think? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(7). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n7.4

Holstrom, L., Ruiz, D., & Weller, G. (2007). A New View: reflection and student teacher growth through an epracticum model. E-Learning, 4(1), 5-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/elea.2007.4.1.5

Long, P. D., & Ehrmann, S. D. (2005). Future of the Learning Space: Breaking Out of the Box. EDUCAUSE Review, 40(4), 42-58.

Long, R. D., & Holeton, R. (2009). Signposts of the Revolution? What We Talk about When We Talk about Learning Spaces. EDUCAUSE Review, 44(2), 36-49.

Merryfield, M. (2003). Like a Veil: Cross-cultural Experiential Learning Online. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 3(2). Retrieved from http//www.citejournal.org/vol3/iss2/social studies1.cfm

Murray-Harvey, R. (1999). Paper presented at the Colloquium in Field Based Education, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia, 24-26 November, 1999.

NSW Institute of Teachers. (n.d.). Retrieved from www.nswiot.edu.au

O’Dea, J. A.,Yager, Z., & Crawford, L. (2006). Enhancing course design and learning in blended environments: education students’ attitudes towards and experiences of WebCT. Poster presentation at USyd Edfac Assessment and Learning Forum, June, 2006.

Pajo, P., & Wallace, C. (2001). Barriers To The Uptake Of Web-based Technology by University Teachers. The Journal of Distance Education / Revue de l'Éducation à Distance, 16(1), 70-84.

Palmer, S., & Holt, D. (2009). Staff and student perceptions of an online learning environment: Difference and development Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 366-381.

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to Teach in Higher Education (2nd Edition). London: Routledge-Falmer.

Rowley, J., & O’Dea, J. (2009). How do students perceive the enhancement of their own learning? A quantitative comparison of two Education faculties’ experiences in building an online learning community for bachelor of Music Education and Bachelor of Education students. Conference proceedings ‘Teacher education crossing borders: Cultures, contexts, communities and curriculum’ .The annual conference of the Australian Teacher Education Association (ATEA), Albury, 28 June – 1 July.

Rowley, J .L., & Tindall-Ford, S. (2008). Professional Experience and WebCT at the Sydney Conservatorium of Music. Synergy, 28, 14-21.

Schuck, S. (2003). Getting help from the outside: Developing a support network for beginning teachers. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 4(1), 49-67.s

Taylor, J., Dunbar-Hall, P., & Rowley, J. (2012). Music education students and ePortfolios: a case study in the ‘digital natives’ debate. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(8), 1362-1381.

Whitton, D., Sinclair, C., Barker, K., Nanlohy, P. & Nosworthy, M. (2010). Learning for teaching: teaching for learning (2nd ed.). Southbank, Vic.: Thomson.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ire.v2i1.4794


  • There are currently no refbacks.

 Contact: ire@macrothink.org

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.

Copyright © Macrothink Institute   ISSN 2327-5499