Adapting Grounded Theory in Qualitative Research: Reflections from Personal Experience

Philip Bulawa

Abstract


Grounded theory is one of the methodologies that have been widely used in qualitative research. However, researchers, especially inexperienced ones have not been sure about its use in the process of the data collection and analysis. The uncertainty arises mainly from the differences that have emerged between Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss who previously pioneered grounded theory together. Using the researcher’s own PhD study, this paper seeks to show that grounded theory can be adapted to suit studies being undertaken. It demonstrates that there is no one way of undertaking grounded theory studies, and that the initial approach by Glaser and Strauss was never intended to be dogmatic. The paper shows that while there are common elements across most approaches of grounded theory, theorists and users of this approach have applied it differently. Therefore, this suggests that researchers can adopt and adapt the grounded theory approach for their own research.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Backman, K., & Kyngäs, H. A. (1999). Challenges of the grounded theory approach to a novice researcher. Nursing and Health Sciences, 1, 147-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2018.1999.00019.x

Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (3rd ed.). Toronto:

Oxford University.

Bulawa, P. (2011). Implementation of the Performance Management System in Senior Secondary Schools: The Perspective of the Senior Management Team. PhD thesis. Townsville: James Cook University.

Bulawa, P. (2013). Constraints to Senior Management’s Capacity to Implement the Performance Management System I Senior Secondary Schools in Botswana. International Education Studies, 6(5), 56-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n5p56

Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 249-291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Duchscher, J. E. B., & Morgan, D. (2004). Grounded theory: Reflections on the emergence vs. forcing debate. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(6), 605-612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03249.x

Elliott, N., & Lazenbatt, A. (2005). How to recognise a “quality” grounded theory research study. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(3), 48-52.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. London: Pearson.

Glaser, B. G. (1978). Advances in the methodology of grounded theory: Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley: The Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emergence vs forcing: Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley: The Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley: The Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G. (2004). Naturalist Inquiry and Grounded Theory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(17), 1-19.

Glaser, B. G., & Holton J. (2007). Remodeling grounded theory. Historical Social Research, Supplement, 19, 47-68.

Goulding, C. (1998). Grounded theory: The missing methodology on the interpretivist agenda. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 1(1), 50-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13522759810197587

Goulding, C. (1999). Grounded theory: Some reflections on paradigm, procedures and misconceptions. University of Wolverhampton Business School Working Paper Series.

Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. London: Sage Publications.

Hallberg, L. R. M. (2006). The “core category” of grounded theory: Making constant comparisons. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 1, 141-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482620600858399

Heath, H., & Cowley, S. (2004). Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41, 141-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(03)00113-5

Jeon, Y. H. (2004). The application of grounded theory and symbolic interactionism. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 18(3), 249-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00287.x

LaRossa, R. (2005). Grounded theory methods and qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 837-857. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00179.x

Lomborg, K., & Kirkevold, M. (2003). Truth and validity in grounded theory – a reconsidered realist interpretation of the criteria: Fit, work, relevance and modifiability. Nursing Philosophy, 4,189-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-769X.2003.00139.x

Mansourian, Y. (2006). Adoption of grounded theory in LIS research. New Library World, 107(9/10), 386-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03074800610702589

McMurray, A. J., Pace, R. W., & Scott, D. (2004). Research: A commonsense approach. Southbank, Victoria: Thomson Social Science Press.

Miller, S. I., & Fredericks, M. (1999). How does grounded theory explain? Qualitative Health Research, 9(4), 538-551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104973299129122054

Myers, M. D. (2009). Qualitative research in business & management. London: Sage Publications.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Punch, K. F. (2001). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage Publications.

Punch, K. F. (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. London: Sage Publications.

Rennie, D. L. (1998). Grounded theory methodology: The pressing need for a coherent logic of justification. Theory & Psychology, 8(1), 101-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354398081006

Rennie, D, L. (2000). Grounded theory methodology as methodical hermeneutics: Reconciling realism and relativism. Theory & Psychology, 10(4), 481-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354300104003

Sarker, S., Lau, F., & Sahay, S. (2000). Building an Inductive Theory of Collaboration in Virtual Teams: An Adapted Grounded Theory Approach. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2000.926934

Selden, L. (2005). On grounded theory – with some malice. Journal of Documentation, 61(1), 114-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220410510578041

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Strauss, A, L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842

Tavakol, M., Torabi, S., & Zeialoo, A. A. (2006). Making sense of grounded theory approach: Implications for medical education research. Journal of Medical Education, 9(1), 17-24.

Thomas, G., & James, D. (2006). Reinventing grounded theory: Some questions about theory, ground and discovery. British Educational Research Journal, 32(6), 767-795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01411920600989412

Walker, D., & Myrick, F. (2006). Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 547-559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285972

Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2005). Research Methods in Education: An Introduction. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ire.v2i1.4921

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 Contact: ire@macrothink.org

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'macrothink.org' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.

Copyright © Macrothink Institute   ISSN 2327-5499