A Comparative Analysis: on the Influence of Nature and Structure of Examination on Examination Malpractices among Bachelor of Education Fourth-Year Students in Selected Public and Private Universities in Kenya

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of examination nature and structure of examination   on examination malpractices among Bachelor of Education fourth-year students in both public and private universities in Kenya. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the research encompasses both quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews, targeting a representative sample of students from diverse institutions. The findings reveal that the physical characteristics of examination nature and structure of examinations, such as security measures, seating arrangements, and overall environment, significantly impact students' likelihood to engage in malpractices. Furthermore, comparisons between public and private universities highlight differing levels of malpractice prevalence, influenced by institutional policies and cultural attitudes towards cheating. The study underscores the need for universities to enhance examination nature and structure of examination management and enforce stricter examination protocols to mitigate malpractice incidents. Recommendations focus on creating conducive examination environments that discourage unethical behavior while fostering academic integrity. Ultimately, this research contributes to the broader discourse on academic honesty and assessment practices in University Education within the Kenyan context.